John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
chris98251":2dizee6l said:John63":2dizee6l said:chris98251":2dizee6l said:John63":2dizee6l said:You can't be that naive, can you? Did it get us the the SB? Did it get us out of the first round? NO.
FYI guess what let me help you
his stats last year
3448 yards, 8.2 ypa, 65.6 compt%, 35 tds, 7 ints, 110.9 QB rating and 376 rushing o tds.
Now another year
4024 yards,8.3 ypa, 68.1 complt%, 34 tds, 8 int, 110.1 Qb rating, 553 yards rushing, and 4 tds
Sorry to tell you, you can make a case season 2 2015 was his best. More yards, higher complt %, more rushing yards more total tds, virtual identical Qb ratings.
The difference more passing attempts, and we made it to the 2nd round of the playoffs, and we ran a more pass friendly offense while still maintaining a top 3 run game and having a top 5 offense. Would have gone farther if we did not revert to our run at all cost offense.
ONCE again the FACTS will set you free, well maybe not you but anyone else.
One fact nobody wants to incorporate is was the offense balanced, was a lot of those yards in prevent defense coming from behind versus playing with a lead, was his receivers healthy or were they using bench players it can go on, why stats are not the catch all in everything.
Perhaps but they are a lot better than an obviously biased stance by someone who also makes stats up. Not to mention the stats above were to show he was once again wrong about the best season. One thing I do know people trying to make you ignore, over look or minimize facts and stats know the facts are not on their side.
It is harder to rate a QB when they don't have some relative consistency, such as the same OC, WR, O Line, and RB or coach. They say QB but really it's about everyone around him and how he performs with that group.
Now take him out of that constant aspect and can he adapt and make a lesser or different group function better then the last guy no matter his stats.
Kurt Warner is a good example of a QB that made a offense work in LA, could not in New York but did again in Arizona.
Its very simple to rate them, the things you bring up allow for those ratings to be questioned. An example If I rate QBs based on Qb rating its open and shot. Now if you want to bring up mitigating things that might have elevated or decreased a QBs rating that is another thing, but does not change the fact his QB rating was what it was.
Example Wilson Career QB rating is over 100. You can however argue it could be higher if he had more talent at WR, or you could argue it would be less if he threw more. Neither changes the facts he has a career QB rating over 100 though. That fact or Stat is open-and-shut. How much that stats means to you is a different story and is a matter of opinion, but not a matter you can argue the fact is his career QB rating is over 100.