I cannot stand that term or Jim Moore.SoulfishHawk":1fa87amh said:Here comes Jim Moore: The Cooking People
So damn stupid
It’s a simple fix. Play all quarters like you play the 4th qtr.Sgt. Largent":2sk9gsec said:You mean the QB's who's now a top 2-3 elite perennial All Pro that's in the top 5 of every statistical category that matters and is on his way to the HOF?
Yeah we should definitely stop all this and do something different.
I didn’t know Pete and Marty had an account here, just joking. 8)Ad Hawk":28ijdi6q said:Define exactly what that will look like, please.
I'm curious, SportsHernia, how different that would look than what the Hawks actually did this past season. Please be very specific, on a play-by-play basis, or some examples that aren't just generalities. I'm not implying you cannot do this; but that I've not yet seen clear examples (down-and-distance type O-Cord. decisions) shown as to a better way by those arguing "yes" to this poll.
Maybe it's just an execution problem early on, and not specifically play-calling. I guess I just need to know more before I can honestly take the poll.
Erebus":ni86tu33 said:I don't know what Pete will do, so I can't answer the poll. Based on past history, I'd say its unlikely. However, if the question was should instead of will, then the answer would be a resounding yes.
I don't know about "Sports Hernia", but for me?, it's a matter of TRUST, trust in whether or not, you trust your Quarterback to make the right decisions while under the gun, BEFORE the 4th quarter gets under way...IF Russ is pulling the Coaches fat out of the fire in the last 15 minutes to win the game?, why not TRUST him to start EARLIER in the game, instead of waiting for the opponent to DICTATE, and sometimes lock up the game....IF other Coaches know that Wilson is under constraints, they will hold their load, just like the Packers did in the Playoffs.....Trust Russ, or trust the man on the side-lines >>> Schottenheimer....I know where my faith lies....A top 3 Quarterback...PERIOD.Ad Hawk":otca76u9 said:Define exactly what that will look like, please.
I'm curious, SportsHernia, how different that would look than what the Hawks actually did this past season. Please be very specific, on a play-by-play basis, or some examples that aren't just generalities. I'm not implying you cannot do this; but that I've not yet seen clear examples (down-and-distance type O-Cord. decisions) shown as to a better way by those arguing "yes" to this poll.
Maybe it's just an execution problem early on, and not specifically play-calling. I guess I just need to know more before I can honestly take the poll.
I know this is not what you are looking for but I’ll answer your question with a Few questions.Ad Hawk":9rwr6yar said:So far, nobody has shown specifics of down-and-distance specific decisions that should be different. You're just noting the same generalities as usual.
Is Russ as successful as he is in the 2nd half BECAUSE of the first-half rope-a-dope, or conservative play-calling, or what have you? I'm not blindly defending PC's approach; there'a a good chance his game should change with Russ behind center. But I can't vote on this poll until I know more than a few fans saying "turn Russ loose."
Where's the actual evidence of what plays were called, why they were called in those specific situations, and what PC's actual philosophy is, not what fans, educated as they may be in football generally, surmise about the specifics of this team?