Do Not Sell My Personal Information

PFF: Brooks > Queen

The Original Seattle Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute for Seahawks Talk, News, Rumors, Trades, and Analytics. LANGUAGE: PG-13
PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 10:36 am

Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:54 pm
  • But, but Queen.
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6774
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:04 pm


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:58 pm
  • Seanhawk wrote:But, but Queen.

    No.
    Thepeelsessions
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1728
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:05 am
    Location: Out here


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:59 pm
  • They like their guy, we like ours. At some point, it's time to move on from dwelling on the Queen thing.
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17122
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 2:14 pm
  • bUT hE wASn't A hAlL oF fAmER iN hiS FIrsT gAMe!!!1111!!
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7224
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 3:47 pm
  • I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.
    sdog1981
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2848
    Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:54 am


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 3:55 pm
  • Boom ^
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17122
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 4:19 pm
  • sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.


    WTF?

    You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

    JFC, this place.
    Hockey Guy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 630
    Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 9:03 am


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 5:18 pm
  • That article rates both of them poorly.
    Rat
    * NET Cynic *
     
    Posts: 6391
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm
    Location: Grand Rapids, MI


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 6:47 pm
  • Hockey Guy wrote:
    sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.


    WTF?


    You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

    JFC, this place.


    I especially liked when he paired up with Ronnie Dunn
    BChawkfan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1010
    Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:13 pm


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 8:13 pm
  • Willie G a y Jr. > Brooks > Queen
    massari
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1728
    Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:58 am


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:20 pm
  • Erick Johnson used to tell us Queen 2>Abbey Road...
    evergreen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 761
    Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:56 pm


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:58 pm
  • evergreen wrote:Erick Johnson used to tell us Queen 2>Abbey Road...


    I'll take any Queen album over The Beatles.
    12AngryHawks
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 413
    Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:42 pm
    Location: Central Valley, CA


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 10:19 pm
  • Hockey Guy wrote:
    sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.


    WTF?

    You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

    JFC, this place.


    No. Because he has taste.
    Nothinbutm
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 640
    Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:14 pm
    Location: El Paso, TX


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Wed Jan 06, 2021 10:19 pm
  • Rat wrote:That article rates both of them poorly.


    That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

    Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

    Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

    It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.
    Chapow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3688
    Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:38 pm


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:40 pm
  • Chapow wrote:
    Rat wrote:That article rates both of them poorly.


    That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

    Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

    Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

    It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.


    Brooks get marked down quite a bit due to his coverage grade.
    HawkStrong
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 650
    Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:23 pm


Re: PFF: Brooks > Queen
Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:05 pm
  • Linebacker isn’t a quick break in in the NFL. The jump from college to nfl at that position is huge. Well have a better read on Brooks next season.
    HawkNuts
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 583
    Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:34 pm




It is currently Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:55 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ SEATTLE SEAHAWKS FOOTBALL ]




Information