Don't take my word for it.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/jordyn-bro ... 01713.html

But, but Queen.

Seanhawk wrote:But, but Queen.

No.

They like their guy, we like ours. At some point, it's time to move on from dwelling on the Queen thing.

bUT hE wASn't A hAlL oF fAmER iN hiS FIrsT gAMe!!!1111!!

I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

Boom ^

sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?

You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.

That article rates both of them poorly.

Hockey Guy wrote:

sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?


You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.

I especially liked when he paired up with Ronnie Dunn

Willie G a y Jr. > Brooks > Queen

Erick Johnson used to tell us Queen 2>Abbey Road...

evergreen wrote:Erick Johnson used to tell us Queen 2>Abbey Road...

I'll take any Queen album over The Beatles.

Hockey Guy wrote:

sdog1981 wrote:I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?

You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.

No. Because he has taste.

Rat wrote:That article rates both of them poorly.

That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.

Chapow wrote:

Rat wrote:That article rates both of them poorly.

That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.

Brooks get marked down quite a bit due to his coverage grade.

Linebacker isn’t a quick break in in the NFL. The jump from college to nfl at that position is huge. Well have a better read on Brooks next season.