Anyone have PFF Grades for Jordyn Brooks?

JayhawkMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
829
Over the last few games?

I am just curious how an objective rating service sees him. I don’t pay enough to his position to evaluate though the defense is bad.
 

misfit

Active member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
667
Reaction score
32
I only have edge so for the season these are his grades

2021 PLAYER GRADES
OVERALL
52.8
RUN DEFENSE
62.3
PASS RUSH
68.2
COVERAGE
45.7

He's ranked 50th out of 86 linebackers. Bobby is 11th.
 

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
4,521
Reaction score
1,366
Curious how he compares to P Queen on PFF as Queen by all of the "experts" was rated higher.
 

misfit

Active member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
667
Reaction score
32
seabowl":248p94ff said:
Curious how he compares to P Queen on PFF as Queen by all of the "experts" was rated higher.
Patrick Queen \
80 out of 86

DEFENSE GRADE
35.4
80th / 86 LB

RUN DEFENSE GRADE
42.8
65th / 82 LB

PASS RUSH GRADE
63.4
COVERAGE GRADE
37.3
72nd / 77 LB

Jordyn Brooks

DEFENSE GRADE
52.8
50th / 86 LB

RUN DEFENSE GRADE
62.3
26th / 82 LB

PASS RUSH GRADE
68.2
COVERAGE GRADE
45.7
55th / 77 LB
 

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
seabowl":1fx7sz2h said:
Curious how he compares to P Queen on PFF as Queen by all of the "experts" was rated higher.

Probably flipped like all the “experts” here that had LJ over Sweat and Penny over Chubb.
 
OP
OP
J

JayhawkMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
829
Looks like neither are good at this point. IF we had to fill that position I would have wanted Queen at the time but I think I personally was okay with a RB or I think the board was thinking Gross-Matos or a Blaylock or Espensa at the time. Honestly haven’t checked how any of them have turned out.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
6,797
Location
Cockeysville, Md
I watch Ravens games every Sunday because my dad is a diehard. Brooks is far better than Queen. Not even close.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,012
Reaction score
1,706
Location
Sammamish, WA
JayhawkMike":2inogyw9 said:
Looks like neither are good at this point. IF we had to fill that position I would have wanted Queen at the time but I think I personally was okay with a RB or I think the board was thinking Gross-Matos or a Blaylock or Espensa at the time. Honestly haven’t checked how any of them have turned out.

Doesn't seem like Gross-Matos is doing all that well either. There are rumors that he's a trade candidate from the Panthers -

Unfortunately this info is off Lions wire :pukeface: but that's what came up for Gross-matos trade rumors - https://lionswire.usatoday.com/list...ade-deadline-targets-rumors-players-to-watch/
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
A very questionable use of draft capitol. The Seahawks had far more pressing issues than Mike Backer of the future at the time. Forcing him to play out of position.

He's played okay out of position. He will be even better at Mike. I liked him over Queen. But still...
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,214
Reaction score
1,814
Brooks is flat out a liability in zone v. the seam passing stacks that are scorching the Hawks D. He's truly a Mike LB playing out of position at WOLB he's been OK against the run, but seems to struggle with misdirection a bit. He is unquestionably a good tackler though.

He is better than Queen by a good bit. I think the team should have picked an OLineman when the drafted Brooks but time will tell.
 
Top