chris98251":2fps08fo said:
WE ARE NOT BIGGER THEN THE TEAM, pat yourselves on the back sure if we influence things at times but we are not owed a damn thing other then the best product that can be put on a field and the best effort these guys can give us win our lose.
Enjoy that we are recognised, enjoy that the team recognises us and wants us as part of THEIR identity, but don't think we are bigger then the team and the sum of it's parts.
I just read this whole thread, and I really am confused. Chris, I am responding specifically to your post, but it is representative of a bunch of others, and I don't get what you're on about.
Who the heck is saying we are bigger than the team and the sum of its parts? Has there been anybody among this fan base who has claimed that the 12th Man was so much a part of their victories, that they would have been a worse team with a more normal crowd?
As far as I can tell, we are just relishing the role we have in games, which is substantial according to the players and coaches and FO and media and opposing teams. And we thoroughly enjoy the recognition and appreciation of the players and coaches etc.
People in this thread are complaining about us getting too much recognition as the 12th Man, as if we were the ones out there lobbying for the players to say something about us or put a 12 on the rings and uniforms. There's nothing bad or unreasonable about wanting that recognition and appreciation, and enjoying it when it comes our way. And the players sure as hell don't resent it. (They do resent a few individual 12s making asses out of themselves in public by demanding autographs and photos when the players are out with their loved ones, but that's a different conversation.)
It's one thing to be sick of the media overdoing something -- that happens a lot, and it is annoying. But getting upset about how much publicity the 12th Man gets from the Seahawks players and coaches and FO and owner? And thinking that the players might somehow resent us for it? I just don't get what the objection is.