HawKnPeppa
New member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 4,733
- Reaction score
- 0
And I know just the Man for the job. [emoji41]Tech Worlds":1g7y2clv said:Snark?
This situation requires some serious close monitoring.
And I know just the Man for the job. [emoji41]Tech Worlds":1g7y2clv said:Snark?
This situation requires some serious close monitoring.
As in Boiler Makers?Boiler":h6tm4hn3 said:This is a rare opportunity to say my two most favorite football phrases at the same time: Go Hawks and Boiler Up!
Scottemojo":2frcisw9 said:I was happy as hell to be wrong. Heard the terms, was even happier.Cartire":2frcisw9 said:Scottemojo":2frcisw9 said:This post added nothing to real discussion.Cartire":2frcisw9 said:Wait.
I was told the signing of KJ prevented Avril from being resigned from the .net GM's.
Lets be honest. The REAL conversation is always about what .net thinks and why they're wrong. :stirthepot:
Lets be honest. We both have been guilty of snark at times, and when we are, the board suffers for it. I wanted to retort in a different way, but decided against it. Your post was vindictive and mean spirited, I have no idea if you were trying to elevate yourself or bring others down, but look at your post. Which part of it was intended to further discussion?
Snark kills discussion. It keeps lurkers from becoming posters, because their opinion will eventually meet snark. It leads to a cycle of name calling and locks and bans.
The KJ thread was awesome until it was invaded by snark. There was actual commendation given to opposing opinions, until snark. People stopped sharing their thoughts, and it turned into I win or you lose. Which sucks.
And the Avril thread didn't get through one page when you were the first to lob a snark bomb. I have no idea if in your head I am some self appointed NET GM, but I was certainly one who thought KJ would cost Avril. As I have said, I was so happy to be wrong.
If you think the real conversation is about being right or wrong, well I guess that is up to you. It isn't my preference.
Cartire":3qnu4ude said:Huh? Who are you talking to here? Me?
I think the issue is that everyone is far to serious. I even had an emoji. Thats the international sign for lighten up. If you have to write 4 paragraphs about this, then you you're being bothered a bit to easy about nothing. The problem isnt snarky people. The problem is that everyone thinks everything is snark. The other problem is that the work snark is all of a sudden being used so much. Is that the word of the day?
Cartire":1gho4jiv said:Huh? Who are you talking to here? Me?
I think the issue is that everyone is far to serious. I even had an emoji. Thats the international sign for lighten up. If you have to write 4 paragraphs about this, then you youre being bothered a bit to easy about nothing. The problem isnt snarky people. The problem is that everyone thinks everything is snark. The other problem is that the work snark is all of a sudden being used so much. Is that the word of the day?
NFSeahawks628":e18g9zav said:Cartire":e18g9zav said:Huh? Who are you talking to here? Me?
I think the issue is that everyone is far to serious. I even had an emoji. Thats the international sign for lighten up. If you have to write 4 paragraphs about this, then you you're being bothered a bit to easy about nothing. The problem isnt snarky people. The problem is that everyone thinks everything is snark. The other problem is that the work snark is all of a sudden being used so much. Is that the word of the day?
It's the slight of hand comments that are unneeded, people should be allowed to say what they think, and be allowed to be wrong. No need to call each other out. Putting pride aside it's a sports forum board meant for discussion. With discussion you get varying opinions on different topics.
I can't really say I whole heartedly thought resigning KJ Wright was a bigger need than Byron Maxwell, but that would just be my opinion, and maybe the Seahawks will do that anyway.
Different views allow discussion to thrive and learning to take place.
As someone on these boards that called for Ruskell's head long before most people, I could not agree with you more man. I suffered a LOT of backlash for that opinion as did a few other pretty good posters that were eventually driven away from these boards (e.g. Puntaphilie). I was even put on ignore for quite a while by at least one poster that's still quite active on these boards for having a different opinion about Timmy than he did! How freakin' silly!kearly":37pod2ux said:.........I differ with the other part of Hans' argument though, which is classic appeal to authority fallacy. That we should never question decisions made by people that are better than us. We know this is flawed not only because of CBJ and Harvin, but because of the pedestal that Tim Ruskell once stood upon.
It is much more reasonable to simply express one's opinion, and if it doesn't go lockstep with PC/JS than so be it.......
HansGruber":2a2nb3h2 said:This forum is slowly turning into webzone, and it's exactly that type of idiotic behavior that's making it happen.