MANUNITED23":1uyf5s98 said:Boldin is over rated, there is no way in the universe he'll have a good game against Hawks.
He isn't getting shut out, either.... So what would you consider a good/bad game?
MANUNITED23":1uyf5s98 said:Boldin is over rated, there is no way in the universe he'll have a good game against Hawks.
MOCHawk":37j6foxs said:I doubt that we will play Man/Press even 25% of the time in this game. Maybe some on 3rd down when we are sending 6 (which I hope is often.) Playing man to man and rushing 4 against Kaep is suicide.
13thMan":3antjjlo said:MANUNITED23":3antjjlo said:Boldin is over rated, there is no way in the universe he'll have a good game against Hawks.
He isn't getting shut out, either.... So what would you consider a good/bad game?
Johnny":1tmxto78 said:The last time Boldin played against the Hawks back in 2011', He only had 2 catches for 22 yards on 9 targets.. I know that was with Flacco at QB but still he didn't have to much of an impact as far as catches & yards go.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=311113026
MANUNITED23":mk6tyb9h said:13thMan":mk6tyb9h said:MANUNITED23":mk6tyb9h said:Boldin is over rated, there is no way in the universe he'll have a good game against Hawks.
He isn't getting shut out, either.... So what would you consider a good/bad game?
No TD's and less than 70 yards receiving.
mretrade":2e6ba65s said:The 49ers are planning on unleashing Quinton Patton this weekend against the Seahawks. You heard it here first.
CANHawk":1mq4sovf said:I seriously don't know why anyone is worried about Anquan Boldin. He's not super big with crazy long arms like Brandon Marshall or Megatron, he's not crazy fast like Mike Wallace, he doesn't run particularly crisp routes (he's okay, but he's not exactly Brandon Stokley out there). Sure he's a cagey old vet who knows a few tricks, but it's going to take more than old man tricks to beat the LoB+T3*. I think that cracker jack recieving corps gets shut down on Sunday and we force SF to beat us on the ground. conversely, I say Russell and our own high quality WR corps shreds SF's cracker jack secondary on our way to RW putting up 400 yards.
*Okay, is T3 part of the LoB, or is he like an add on or something. Love some clarification on that...
pehawk":29ygeupe said:Can Browner by Cyborg?
hawk45":1bjbiy0g said:Smelly McUgly":1bjbiy0g said:From another perspective, if there ever was a game where we have the matchups available to induce multiple coverage sacks like we did last year at home against Green Bay, this is also it.
How so? If you're talking about the times Boldin lines up outside then okay, yeah, Sherman/BB disappear him and their other scrubs won't do much.
But when Boldin is in the slot, inducing coverage sacks assumes WTIII can defend him. Maybe he can, maybe he can't.
I don't see how the matchups are in our favor against Boldin or VD. Where do the coverage sacks come from again?
mretrade":k2ox71t7 said:He has never had 400 yards in a game.
mretrade":36e7nh6v said:Yeah because I am sure Wilson is going to have his first ever 400 yard game Sunday? *sarcasm*