XxXdragonXxX":2qou57yb said:
rcaido":2qou57yb said:
Siouxhawk":2qou57yb said:
So if the Browns just cut Brock, they pay $16 million for a second-round draft pick? Why does that not sound like a good deal to me?
Yeah I don't get it either. They ahve to give up their 4th round pick too. So pretty much just moving up 1 round and absorbing the 16 million contract. It helps the brown try too meet the required salary cap spending. Seems really lazy then trying to find players that can actually help their team. I mean that's 16mill, they could have gotten some 1 year prove it players or maybe sign Pryor. I don't get why this is consider a genius move. Can someone explain.
They have way to much cap space to spend. They also got a 6th round pick in the deal so they didnt just move up from the 4th to the 2nd.
Also spening 16 mil to get a draft pick that could be with you for yearsis better than wasting 16 mil on a 1 year deal for some aging vet when you arent anywhere close to being good anyway. This is a build for the future move, youre suggesting a win now move which they have no chance of doing.
I was thinking more along the lines of a 3-year deal for an up-and-comer, a guy they could have around as they build. I just believe that $16 million is way too much to pay for THE CHANCE to draft two players in the 2nd and 6th rounds.
I guess they could keep Osweiler as a backup to Kessler or whatever rookie they draft and waive RG3 to recoup some of that cash.