Eskridge injured on opening kickoff?

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,535
Location
Arizona
I read this somewhere but couldn't find it again when looking for an update. Did anyone else see this or know if it's true?

Any injury update? This poor kid can't catch a break.

Time to move on?
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,200
Reaction score
1,803
Well, he is nothing but consistent, consistently unavailable.

Renofox the info you want is on fieldgulls.com, he has now got a sprained knee.

Tick tock, tick tick, the time is soon to be running out on his time here.
 

Mad Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
637
I'm sure the Hawks were trying to get him some playing time to set up a possible trade for a 7th rounder. Now he's going to be cut. And likely ends up on the PS if he's eligible because no one will even take a flyer on the guy.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,612
I'm sure the Hawks were trying to get him some playing time to set up a possible trade for a 7th rounder. Now he's going to be cut. And likely ends up on the PS if he's eligible because no one will even take a flyer on the guy.

Can they even cut him before his suspension is over?

I think they'll hang onto him this year, then cut him in the off season. His cap hit is relatively low this year for a 4th or 5th receiver, and you know Pete he doesn't like to give up on high picks until the end of their rookie deal.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,612
Yes, why wouldn't they be able to?

Suspended players don't count against the 53 man roster, so not sure why they'd waive him during his suspension.

Again, Eskridge's cap hit isn't really significant enough, unless you're just tired of his nonsense and inability to stay healthy. And like I said, Pete's pretty stubborn with high picks, he doesn't like to cut them until he has to. i.e. Prosise, C-Mike, etc.
 

GGotskill

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
742
Reaction score
641
Suspended players don't count against the 53 man roster, so not sure why they'd waive him during his suspension.

Again, Eskridge's cap hit isn't really significant enough, unless you're just tired of his nonsense and inability to stay healthy. And like I said, Pete's pretty stubborn with high picks, he doesn't like to cut them until he has to. i.e. Prosise, C-Mike, etc.

Ah, I gotcha. I thought you were saying that they *couldn't* cut him during the suspension.
 

12AngryHawks

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
1,696
Reaction score
1,969
Location
Central Valley, CA
Eskridge is just C.J. Prosise 2.0. Idk why the Hawks haven't cut bait yet. Free up the roster spot.
Except Prosise never got suspended, and actually played a pivotal role in the Seahawks victory over the Patriots in 2016. Eskridge has yet to have that kind of impact in a single game so far, and I'm highly skeptical that he ever will.

 
OP
OP
renofox

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,535
Location
Arizona
Suspended players don't count against the 53 man roster, so not sure why they'd waive him during his suspension.

Again, Eskridge's cap hit isn't really significant enough, unless you're just tired of his nonsense and inability to stay healthy. And like I said, Pete's pretty stubborn with high picks, he doesn't like to cut them until he has to. i.e. Prosise, C-Mike, etc.
Add to this that his effective cap hit is actually -0- during the suspension as he gets no game checks.

Makes no sense to cut a player who has no cap hit and doesn't take a spot on the 53.
 

Latest posts

Top