MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,088
- Reaction score
- 717
sdog1981":2dybgbm4 said:How accurate were they last season? The last one I have is the 2013 preview issue.
chris98251":1hlmeqa1 said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
nash72":itwiraot said:chris98251":itwiraot said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Northwest Seahawk":25hmmrvm said:nash72":25hmmrvm said:chris98251":25hmmrvm said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Brady's days are numbered.
nash72":6xkwjmed said:chris98251":6xkwjmed said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
MontanaHawk05":3sl9354d said:nash72":3sl9354d said:chris98251":3sl9354d said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
That would be the logical choice. The AFC is better but generally still pretty sad.HawkGA":1rttjg70 said:A related topic, here are the Vegas odds for Super Bowl matchups (should start at 1, so go back to see the others).
http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/here-a ... s.html/25/
I would love to be able to bet against their most likely match up. If I were making this list, I would put the Patriots and then just list matchups with every other NFC team.
Seymour":4q5mpavu said:MontanaHawk05":4q5mpavu said:nash72":4q5mpavu said:chris98251":4q5mpavu said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
It does not make much logical sense to only use "what ifs" to turn losses into wins, and not do the same to the close wins and turn them into losses as well.
The reason Houshka is a Buffalo Bill isn't Clint Gresham or his replacement, it's the fact he never kicked well at Arizona in that stadium. It's a nitpick but an important one. Either way that game was the dealbreaker for him and the number one seed and a likely matchup with a team the Seahawks would have beaten injuries or not.MontanaHawk05":16q2xjgl said:nash72":16q2xjgl said:chris98251":16q2xjgl said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
MontanaHawk05":3lplxz45 said:nash72":3lplxz45 said:chris98251":3lplxz45 said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
Josea16":hce9qqsx said:The reason Houshka is a Buffalo Bill isn't Clint Gresham or his replacement, it's the fact he never kicked well at Arizona in that stadium. It's a nitpick but an important one. Either way that game was the dealbreaker for him and the number one seed and a likely matchup with a team the Seahawks would have beaten injuries or not.MontanaHawk05":hce9qqsx said:nash72":hce9qqsx said:chris98251":hce9qqsx said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
Personally I have no clue why he would sign with the Bills that stadium is a tough place to kick in for the better part of the season.
MontanaHawk05":2ep8ieou said:nash72":2ep8ieou said:chris98251":2ep8ieou said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.
They would still win 5 of those.
Most other sites and publications have the Falcons and Packers ahead of Seattle and I agree with that until proven differently.
Even though the Seahawks won more games than the Packers and would have won more than the Falcons with a better long snapper?
Josea16":35f5dtpr said:The reason Houshka is a Buffalo Bill isn't Clint Gresham or his replacement, it's the fact he never kicked well at Arizona in that stadium. It's a nitpick but an important one. Either way that game was the dealbreaker for him and the number one seed and a likely matchup with a team the Seahawks would have beaten injuries or not.
Personally I have no clue why he would sign with the Bills that stadium is a tough place to kick in for the better part of the season.
chris98251":3hfv5iz4 said:New England, maybe Tom will have a broken toe nail and sit out 6 games this year.