rastahawk":2c822u0g said:
Uhhh... you know at this point I'd probably rather him over Turbin.
Nah. At this point he has a long, LONG way to go as a RB, and the Hawks already have their returner in Lockett. I'd be vey uncomfortable if Hayne was the 9ers #2 RB. He's great in space and his rugby stiff arm is awesome, but in tight quarters (i.e. 90% of runs) he's nowhere close to someone to count on. To his credit though the stretch zones the 9ers have built into their offense do play to his ability though (his two big runs as an RB have both come off that play).
Right now I think he'll likely make the 53 as a return specialist, with Hunter being the odd man out.
As for the 9ers carrying four RBs, they always carry five RBs/FBs, so that will be totally typical for them and not put any strain anywhere. We also get a sense that this is the plan (4 RBs, 1 FB) from the Cowboys game in which they were using their TEs (who will be active on game days) as 2nd string FBs.
With Hyde as the return specialist it also means that Ellington doesn't become the de facto #3 WR, which was the case when he was also active as a return specialist. Hayne also brings more to the coverage units than Ellington did. Right now Hayne is simply playing his way onto the roster.
Right now for the backfield I'd guess:
53: Hyde. Bush. Hayne, Miller, Davis
53 but not Active 46: Davis
Practice Squad: Millard
Cut: Hunter, Gaskins
For my money, assuming Hunter makes it back to previous form I prefer Hunter to Bush, but the team seems really high on Bush, although I have my doubts about that.