kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,975
- Reaction score
- 0
He gives up too many plays for my liking. When he was on Gronk the Pats went after him basically every time and made beating him look so easy. He's also been a step slow in run support. Our defense is the best in the league at preventing big plays, but Wright probably contributes to that stat the least out of all the regular starters. He gives up plays. Not because of mistakes, but because a 6'4" 250 pound guy isn't really what you would call an ideal WLB. If there weren't drawbacks to playing that position at that size, you'd see a lot more of them around the league in 4-3 defenses.
He's an assignment sound player and probably a "good example" guy, the kind coaches love. He will occasionally make nice open field tackles. Back in 2011 and 2012, he was outstanding at setting the edge at the line as a SAM LB vs. the run. I wish I had a way of knowing if his quiet contributions outweigh his liabilities, but even if they did, I seriously doubt they would be enough to justify that kind of pay.
Our team runs a 4-3 defense that is built around rushing four. You literally cannot build a defense that puts less strain on LBs, especially when the other LBs you line up next to run 4.4 and 4.5. Like Tical said, draft a couple of mid-round LBs and it's almost guaranteed that one of them will be 90% as good as Wright.
I don't know if Seattle signed Wright for statement purposes, but I do think he is the kind of player who's best features will play into coach biases and therefore cause him to be overvalued internally.
I look at it this way, if you are the GM and you have $5 million to spend, are you giving it to Wright or to Mebane? I can't imagine many people would be saying Wright. And yet, Mebane might very well be a cap casualty this offseason thanks in part to the Wright extension. It's the not the end of the world, but do I think such a decision is optimal? No. And it's hardly the first sup-optimal move JS has made. He's great, but he isn't perfect.
He's an assignment sound player and probably a "good example" guy, the kind coaches love. He will occasionally make nice open field tackles. Back in 2011 and 2012, he was outstanding at setting the edge at the line as a SAM LB vs. the run. I wish I had a way of knowing if his quiet contributions outweigh his liabilities, but even if they did, I seriously doubt they would be enough to justify that kind of pay.
Our team runs a 4-3 defense that is built around rushing four. You literally cannot build a defense that puts less strain on LBs, especially when the other LBs you line up next to run 4.4 and 4.5. Like Tical said, draft a couple of mid-round LBs and it's almost guaranteed that one of them will be 90% as good as Wright.
I don't know if Seattle signed Wright for statement purposes, but I do think he is the kind of player who's best features will play into coach biases and therefore cause him to be overvalued internally.
I look at it this way, if you are the GM and you have $5 million to spend, are you giving it to Wright or to Mebane? I can't imagine many people would be saying Wright. And yet, Mebane might very well be a cap casualty this offseason thanks in part to the Wright extension. It's the not the end of the world, but do I think such a decision is optimal? No. And it's hardly the first sup-optimal move JS has made. He's great, but he isn't perfect.