OkieHawk
New member
Cyrus12":3qsuzmlx said:
False.
Lynch Injury
- Thread starter Ozzy
- Start date
False.
Largent80
New member
Cyrus12":dudkezt9 said:
Also...INCORRECT.
homerun1970
Active member
Rawls is good enough. I think if the LOB keeps their recievers from getting verticle the Hawks win.
Hawkpower
Well-known member
Tech Worlds":19qco0pn said:Based on a small sample size I suppose.Hawkpower":19qco0pn said:sutz":19qco0pn said:I don't put a lot of stock in internet diagnoses and doctors. Sure, he skipped practice and got "treatment" but that could mean a lot of things, not necessarily a full on hernia.
If that was the case, he'd be listed as "out" by now. Pete didn't seem concerned in Friday's interview. :229031_shrug:
It sounds more like a relatively minor, if painful, muscle strain of some kind. Thankfully, Rawls is not exactly a bad option.
I love Beast, and we need him.....but based on the numbers thus far Rawls would be an upgrade...........
Yes, well that sample size is.....this season.
Small, but relevant. Clearly Lynch has had the better career, and is the better back........but may not be as effective as Rawls....this year due to a variety of factors.
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,931
- Reaction score
- 475
OkieHawk":9vf8cf9x said:
Hawks have played horribly without him. Rawls will need to step up in a big way. And he very well might.
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,931
- Reaction score
- 475
Polaris":1qnyi1br said:
Don't be a pain. Seattle has not consistently played well, especially in the passing game.
Fortunately, Lynch is warming up on the field now.
MontanaHawk05":14pdh36w said:
No pain intended. Yes Seattle lost the Cincy game, but not having Marshawn in the game wasn't it and I can say that about most of the games this year. The win or loss had little to do with Marshawn for the most part.
That said, I am not denying that we're better with him than without him, but if we had to do without, I'd be more comfortable doing without him with Rawls than I felt before this year
OkieHawk
New member
Polaris":kk6f0m6i said:
This.
Rob12
New member
I think this "Rawls is an upgrade over Lynch" talk is absurd. Rawls has had a good half rookie season so far... But to say he's somehow an upgrade over the most punishing and physical back of our generation is laughable.
I guess some forget easily. Lynch went for 100+ in our last game, BTW. Looking much like his old self in the process.
I guess some forget easily. Lynch went for 100+ in our last game, BTW. Looking much like his old self in the process.
Sports Hernia
Well-known member
Yep, Nowak isn't.
Hawkpower
Well-known member
Rob12":3q6gecr3 said:
You are right, to a certain degree.
Maybe upgrade is too strong of a word. He has been the more productive back in 2015 thus far, perhaps that reads better.
I still want Lynch out there though.
chris98251
Well-known member
Rawls is a quick back that has power, Lynch a Power back with quick feet.
Rocket
Active member
Yeah, you are...Sports Hernia":ahjcb43q said:Yep, Sports Hernia's are not always bad.HoustonHawk82":ahjcb43q said:
Love ya, Bro.
Rocket
Active member
That was quite good, and accurate.chris98251":11n521zy said:
HawkFan72
Active member
I still think Rawls will get more carries tonight. I hope Lynch feels magically better and can do his thing, but reports are that he is in a lot of pain.
brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
We are a run first team.... That can't run block. If there is no threat of the run at all then our passing offense is limited and really doesn't work either. For all the whining about the passing game some of you do you sure have t noticed the beating our backs are taking.
Similar threads
