NFLPA Grades All Teams On Treatment Of Players

[NoGain]

I thought this was a very interesting topic that came out the other day. They graded all franchises on eight categories:

1) Treatment of player's families
2) Food service/nutrition
3) Weight room
4) Strength coaches
5) Training room
6) Training staff
7) Locker room
8) Team travel

When all the grades were compiled, this is how all the teams fared on an aggregate basis:

1. Vikings
2. Dolphins
3. Raiders
4. Texans
5. Cowboys
6. Packers
7. 49ers
8. Giants
9. Bills
10. Saints
11. Seahawks
12. Panthers
13. Bears
14. Eagles
15. Lions
16. Colts
17. Ravens
18. Titans
19. Jets
20. Broncos
21. Browns
22. Steelers
23. Falcons
24. Patriots
25. Rams
26. Bucs
27. Bengals
28. Jaguars
29. Chiefs
30. Chargers
31. Cardinals
32. Commanders

I thought the Hawks would finish a bit higher because of Paul Allen, but we still came in 11th place. This is interesting in how it might effect something like FAcy.

PS> Oops, saw this was already posted on Seahawks forum.
Anyway...food for thought...

 

[SantaClaraHawk]

I hadn’t seen the aggregate scores. They don’t seem to support a strong correlation toward winning or losing.

Some of the categories are specious. For example, players refer to their wives or partners having to nurse on the floor of a public bathroom In the “family room” question. There are family bathrooms for public and even when not, theres A toilet to sit on. So the floor thing is bullshit.

Otherwise, I noticed that the Broncos had low ratings when it came to nutrition plans. Russ is fatter than he was. Are other men?