MizzouHawkGal
Well-known member
This.kidhawk":3pibkpi5 said:Does he deserve it....Yes
Will he get in.....no
This.kidhawk":3pibkpi5 said:Does he deserve it....Yes
Will he get in.....no
Homerism.kearly":1go54p1b said:I see a lot of Seattle sports fan syndrome in this thread. Personally, I would be really surprised if he's not in at some point. The Hall is for icons and legends, and only a handful of RBs in the history of the game have been bigger icons than Lynch.
bjornanderson21":3frj8hfi said:Homerism.kearly":3frj8hfi said:I see a lot of Seattle sports fan syndrome in this thread. Personally, I would be really surprised if he's not in at some point. The Hall is for icons and legends, and only a handful of RBs in the history of the game have been bigger icons than Lynch.
Icon to who? Seattle fans?
While some seahawks fans were obsessing over him, the rest of the NFL fandom wasn't. People know he was really good for a while, but icon is a serious stretch for anyone not obsessed with the Hawks.
He is about as much an icon as Chris Johnson was in his prime, and you don't hear people calling Chris Johnson an icon.
bjornanderson21":x9tgeold said:Homerism.kearly":x9tgeold said:I see a lot of Seattle sports fan syndrome in this thread. Personally, I would be really surprised if he's not in at some point. The Hall is for icons and legends, and only a handful of RBs in the history of the game have been bigger icons than Lynch.
Icon to who? Seattle fans?
While some seahawks fans were obsessing over him, the rest of the NFL fandom wasn't. People know he was really good for a while, but icon is a serious stretch for anyone not obsessed with the Hawks.
He is about as much an icon as Chris Johnson was in his prime, and you don't hear people calling Chris Johnson an icon.
SixSeahawk":3orzm39e said:bjornanderson21":3orzm39e said:Homerism.kearly":3orzm39e said:I see a lot of Seattle sports fan syndrome in this thread. Personally, I would be really surprised if he's not in at some point. The Hall is for icons and legends, and only a handful of RBs in the history of the game have been bigger icons than Lynch.
Icon to who? Seattle fans?
While some seahawks fans were obsessing over him, the rest of the NFL fandom wasn't. People know he was really good for a while, but icon is a serious stretch for anyone not obsessed with the Hawks.
He is about as much an icon as Chris Johnson was in his prime, and you don't hear people calling Chris Johnson an icon.
I'm in Toronto. Nobody cares about the Seahawks this far away from Seattle but we definitely know what Marshawn Lynch has done.
You sound a little bitter about something.
kearly":qp00umb9 said:Sgt. Largent":qp00umb9 said:kearly":qp00umb9 said:And I'm not really sure the press hated him all that much either, outside of a small handful of vocal popoffs. If the press hated him, then why did his podium dominate press traffic like we'd never seen before? Some press members may have been frustrated in the moment, but articles on Lynch have mostly been very kind.
Because it was a story, and the biggest story BECAUSE of how Lynch refused to talk.
It's a give and take, and Lynch never gave.........so IMO that doesn't help a borderline HOF player like Lynch. If he was top 10 in yards and TD's? Doesn't matter, but he's not.
I think most of them loved it. Even without him saying much, it got them clicks.
kearly":11v3rmkj said:Does he belong? Definitely.
Will he get in? He won't be a first ballot guy, but he'll get in eventually I think. His stats are low end, but it's called the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of stats. There's too much NFL mythology and lore wrapped around him to not be in the HoF, IMO. Bevell calling that slant on the 1 yard line might have cost us a SB, but I think it cemented Lynch as an NFL legend.
And as mentioned by others above, Earl Campbell's career numbers are very similar to Lynch's, which is no doubt a case that will be made when Lynch's candidacy is debated.
Comparing Lynch to Shaun misses the point. Alexander was the beneficiary of the best offensive line in the NFL and a top ranked offense. Alexander was never really respected all that much during his time because of his rep for avoiding hits and being a finesse player. The opposite is true for Lynch. He had to produce behind mostly terrible OL play and fought hard for every inch, earning the reverence of NFL players across the league. When young RBs were asked who they wanted to be when they grew up, they said Lynch, not AP. Shaun never had anything close to that level of respect.
And I'm not really sure the press hated him all that much either, outside of a small handful of vocal popoffs. If the press hated him, then why did his podium dominate press traffic like we'd never seen before? Some press members may have been frustrated in the moment, but articles on Lynch have mostly been very kind.
HawkFan72":2xbmlxzk said:Comparing him to Campbell makes me agree that he should be in there. I was on the fence, but that tipped the scales for me.
Yes, Si is on the right track. Lynch is near the back of a long line of RB's on the outside looking in, almost all of whom have better numbers than he does. Edgerrin, Gore, Fred Taylor, Corey Dillon, Shaun Alexander, Ricky Watters, Tiki Barber etc., all have better numbers than Marshawn, and I'd probably argue that none of them are HOF worthy. It has been a long, long time since somebody with Marshawn Lynch numbers got in the HOF. Hall of Very Good and Ring of Honor? Definitely.Uncle Si":i0q7dmql said:Hall of Fame is funny.
He won't be judged against RBs of the past, but of his era (last 15-20 years). In that, you would include an Emmit Smith (all time yardage leader), Tomlinson (TD record), AP (2000 yard season, single game record), Faulk, Terrel Davis (2000 yard season), Alexander (TD record, MVP, 5 TD game). How do his stats compare there? They also like those "seminal" athletes... ones who had an impact on the game beyond stats. What does Lynch bring? Statistically he is consistently in the top 1-3 in his prime. But his epic runs are still a part of any playoff our RB highlight reel.
I don't think these comparisons give Lynch a good shot. (once researched). It will come down to his impact on the game while he played it. Not sure its enough in comparison.
Lynch: 9000 yards, 74 TDS, 250 receptions, 1900 yards, 9 TDs
Davis: 16500, 60Tds, 169 receptions, 1300 yards, 5 TDs
Smith: 18000 yards, 164 TDs, 515 receptions, 3200 yards, 11 TDs
Tomlinson: 13000 yards, 145 TDs, 624 receptions, 4800 yards, 17 TDs