John63":1i95r9f4 said:Well I am sorry for you that you are unable to connect dots. OR are that ridiculous to think for one minute that cumulative hits of any player does not have an impact. There are NFL players who have died from it. I have shown were hits were down and impact NFl QBs, Wilson is an NFL Qb enough said. I am guessing though for you if I posted facts showing getting hit by a car is not good you would say show me where it is not good for Wilson too. Right.
John63":2ogys5ng said:Ad Hawk":2ogys5ng said:John63":2ogys5ng said:Ad Hawk":2ogys5ng said:You've been hit a lot? They've added up over time, you think?
That could explain a lot about you.
But proves nothing about Russell Wilson.
Ahh yet I showed links and FACTS to support me and you show nothing. Thanks foro playing but MY pint stands and backe dby facts.
Prove it has affected Russell Wilson. That's what I asked you to do, so your facts are, again, irrelevant to the point.
I have go back to almost any year and you will see and drop off around game 10-12 for a few. By the way you obviously have decided common sense is not your strong point haven't you. I just showed Facts where it happens to every QB and you choose to ignore it and try some juvenile no [rove it happens to Wilson in the 4th qtr do triple over time in the last tenth of a second crap. Nice try your still wrong.
Maelstrom787":3jqnb47s said:John63":3jqnb47s said:Maelstrom787":3jqnb47s said:John63":3jqnb47s said:ahh they did an analysis that is a fact nice try though. sorry dude. As to derailing no, this was about oline I talked about the oline talk to the others about it.
Yes, it is a fact that it is an analysis, but the analysis is based off of a subjective accuracy rating, which makes it an opinion.
If I put together a spreadsheet of "throws I think are good," it isn't automatically fact because it's posted on PFF. This cannot be real lol
posted multiple links and multiple sources of FACTS. so sorry my point is FACT and Proven.
Hmm, no, that's not how subjective analysis works, but okay.
Again, can we proceed with the intention of the thread? That okay with you?
Ad Hawk":2kuoqn98 said:John63":2kuoqn98 said:Well I am sorry for you that you are unable to connect dots. OR are that ridiculous to think for one minute that cumulative hits of any player does not have an impact. There are NFL players who have died from it. I have shown were hits were down and impact NFl QBs, Wilson is an NFL Qb enough said. I am guessing though for you if I posted facts showing getting hit by a car is not good you would say show me where it is not good for Wilson too. Right.
All football players, including QBs, take hits. Some suffer from CTE. Some even die.
On the other hand, many do not. Russ has taken hits. He may suffer from CTE now or later. He may not.
The only dots to connect are if Russ has taken and/or will take the hits that will cause him brain damage or not. Since his current play doesn't indicate any decrease in awareness yet, and he has every willingness to continue playing behind this O-line--by choice, no less, even when/if his life depends on it--then I trust Russell Wilson's opinion over yours. He seems very willing to take that risk.
As I've said, I'd bet Pete would love our O-line to be the best it can be. He'd probably love to see zero sacks. But Football is a game of compromises, player availability, team-fit, etc., and our FO has put their money where their priorities are to help the Seahawks win the most games possible. The first was to pay RW. Good move, obviously. Then they've placed players around him to help the team succeed. They're helping Russ do that.
Ad Hawk":1t20w2wj said:I would add our new rookie RG Damien Lewis who has serious potential to become very good. He's a rook now, of course, but has handled himself well considering there was no preseason and a limited off-season.
John63":1alckyam said:Maelstrom787":1alckyam said:John63":1alckyam said:Maelstrom787":1alckyam said:Yes, it is a fact that it is an analysis, but the analysis is based off of a subjective accuracy rating, which makes it an opinion.
If I put together a spreadsheet of "throws I think are good," it isn't automatically fact because it's posted on PFF. This cannot be real lol
posted multiple links and multiple sources of FACTS. so sorry my point is FACT and Proven.
Hmm, no, that's not how subjective analysis works, but okay.
Again, can we proceed with the intention of the thread? That okay with you?
my links showed Facts to support my point
but let's proceed
Maelstrom787":30ejk985 said:John63":30ejk985 said:Maelstrom787":30ejk985 said:John63":30ejk985 said:posted multiple links and multiple sources of FACTS. so sorry my point is FACT and Proven.
Hmm, no, that's not how subjective analysis works, but okay.
Again, can we proceed with the intention of the thread? That okay with you?
my links showed Facts to support my point
but let's proceed
Your links were:
1. The same exact link posted twice
2. Literally not objective analysis. It was based off of PFF's subjective accuracy ratings, making it a subjective article and therefore based on opinion rather than fact. Not only that, it was speaking about averages, not our specific quarterback.
At this point, you're not just wrong, but you're lying. Plus, you're lying to support an off-topic derailment of a thread. Just stop.
The offensive line has played positively enough to allow the offense to look like world-beaters and free Russell up to be Russell. That is a positive no matter how many of the same PFF link you paste into your comment.
John63":2ji4w8cu said:Maelstrom787":2ji4w8cu said:John63":2ji4w8cu said:Maelstrom787":2ji4w8cu said:Hmm, no, that's not how subjective analysis works, but okay.
Again, can we proceed with the intention of the thread? That okay with you?
my links showed Facts to support my point
but let's proceed
Your links were:
1. The same exact link posted twice
2. Literally not objective analysis. It was based off of PFF's subjective accuracy ratings, making it a subjective article and therefore based on opinion rather than fact. Not only that, it was speaking about averages, not our specific quarterback.
At this point, you're not just wrong, but you're lying. Plus, you're lying to support an off-topic derailment of a thread. Just stop.
The offensive line has played positively enough to allow the offense to look like world-beaters and free Russell up to be Russell. That is a positive no matter how many of the same PFF link you paste into your comment.
Sorry dude not lying, showed facts you showed nothing so in the end your wrong and gone.