kidhawk
Well-known member
adeltaY":84o4r19i said:hawknation2018":84o4r19i said:kidhawk":84o4r19i said:adeltaY":84o4r19i said:Correlation does not imply causation, especially over a three game sample size. There is no evidence over a large sample size that rushing efficiency correlates with improved pass protection. If there is, I'd love to see it and concede I am wrong.
Are you trying to say that a good running game doesn't change the way a defense acts/reacts at the line of scrimmage? That it in know way alters their pass rushing scheme?
It sounds like that is what you are saying, and if so, I couldn't disagree with you more. Teams with a good run game cause defenses to be on guard at all times for the rush. It keeps them from being able to pin their ears and go hard after the quarterback on most plays. This, in and of itself will show a statistical decline in pass rushing for a defense, which in turn shows pass rush improvement for the offense. It's precisely why I believe we need to continue a strong running game. Without it, Wilson is a sitting duck.
This.
It makes sense logically and is conventional wisdom but I haven't seen any evidence that it's true overall. It certainly doesn't have an effect in third and long or any obvious passing down.
It's like saying running the ball early and often wears down a defense and leads to longer runs later in a game. It makes sense but the data doesn't support it.
You're right, it really doesn't change the pass rushing/blocking for obvious passing downs like 3rd and long. Many times we saw ourselves in this situation and saw Wilson running for his life. The run game helps keep you from being in as many of these situations though when it's successful which in turn gives them fewer opportunities to go all out in the pass rush and forget the run which gives the QB just a little more time before the pressure hits.