SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
More like a Pinto bean. Kind of brown, but not black enough....
Largent80":347a3zdg said:He most definitely is NOT a Black Bean.
Anthony!":1trn5hel said:sc85sis":1trn5hel said:For me, the primary takeaway in this thread is that some people have to be "right" and therefore the people they disagree with must be "wrong."
Regarding Russell, yes, he's struggling a bit right now. Yes, it will be a concern if that continues. No, it doesn't mean he sucks.
YMMV
Exactly does not mean he sucks, if it did then all QBS suck because they all have gone through it. interestingly a certain jacknut is doing the same crap on another board and has since Wilson was drafted. He is being hit with the same facts and stats showing he is wrong there, but still only knows his agenda to have been right about how we should not have taken Wilson in the first place.
I think anyone suggesting Russ is somehow a failed experiment is absolutely silly. That said, there's nothing wrong with calling out that he has not looked very sharp in at least, what, 5 out of 9 games this season. I don't think any of us really expect him to become an elite passer like Rodgers (although it would be nice) but clearly he's missed a lot of opportunities to make good plays, and I'm not talking about the missed bomb to Kearse.Scottemojo":csqz0nuu said:People bagging on Russ have to ignore years of evidence, including college, to assume he is broken after a 3 game slump. Most recent is not most pertinent.
Anthony!":3551k1og said:LymonHawk":3551k1og said:Up until three weeks ago? LOL!
BTW: His records for the first 2 years having absolutely nothing to do with how he's playing now.
Actually sure they do if you are playing like a top QB for 2+ years and then have a bad 3 game stretch you do not all of sudden become a non top QB. It shows the 3 games are not the norm but the great play is. So yeah they do matter.
LymonHawk":11se4qyq said:Anthony!":11se4qyq said:LymonHawk":11se4qyq said:Up until three weeks ago? LOL!
BTW: His records for the first 2 years having absolutely nothing to do with how he's playing now.
Actually sure they do if you are playing like a top QB for 2+ years and then have a bad 3 game stretch you do not all of sudden become a non top QB. It shows the 3 games are not the norm but the great play is. So yeah they do matter.
So, is Joe Montana still a top QB? Hey, he was great 20+ years ago!
Anthony!":1c2r8hlb said:LymonHawk":1c2r8hlb said:Anthony!":1c2r8hlb said:LymonHawk":1c2r8hlb said:Up until three weeks ago? LOL!
BTW: His records for the first 2 years having absolutely nothing to do with how he's playing now.
Actually sure they do if you are playing like a top QB for 2+ years and then have a bad 3 game stretch you do not all of sudden become a non top QB. It shows the 3 games are not the norm but the great play is. So yeah they do matter.
So, is Joe Montana still a top QB? Hey, he was great 20+ years ago!
He is arguably one of the best of all times.
LymonHawk":bnq08b52 said:Methinks either you missed the point or you're just being obstinate. Yes Montana WAS a great QB, but; If he were to put on pads today and try to play NFL football, would he still play like a great QB? I think not. :roll:
LymonHawk":2q4nz7sb said:Methinks either you missed the point or you're just being obstinate. Yes Montana WAS a great QB, but; If he were to put on pads today and try to play NFL football, would he still play like a great QB? I think not. :roll:
Cartire":30bjeycf said:LymonHawk":30bjeycf said:Methinks either you missed the point or you're just being obstinate. Yes Montana WAS a great QB, but; If he were to put on pads today and try to play NFL football, would he still play like a great QB? I think not. :roll:
Hold on dude. Are you trying to compare a guy thats been retired for over 15 years to a guy playing in his 3rd year? As if the word WAS is similar in any way?
LymonHawk":b19tjagp said:Cartire":b19tjagp said:LymonHawk":b19tjagp said:Methinks either you missed the point or you're just being obstinate. Yes Montana WAS a great QB, but; If he were to put on pads today and try to play NFL football, would he still play like a great QB? I think not. :roll:
Hold on dude. Are you trying to compare a guy thats been retired for over 15 years to a guy playing in his 3rd year? As if the word WAS is similar in any way?
Nope. Looks like you missed the point too...which is...Just because you used to be good, doesn't mean you still are today.
(Does that make more sense?)
Anthony!":2wudnod1 said:LymonHawk":2wudnod1 said:Cartire":2wudnod1 said:LymonHawk":2wudnod1 said:Methinks either you missed the point or you're just being obstinate. Yes Montana WAS a great QB, but; If he were to put on pads today and try to play NFL football, would he still play like a great QB? I think not. :roll:
Hold on dude. Are you trying to compare a guy thats been retired for over 15 years to a guy playing in his 3rd year? As if the word WAS is similar in any way?
Nope. Looks like you missed the point too...which is...Just because you used to be good, doesn't mean you still are today.
(Does that make more sense?)
Yeah however again not relevant here at all and again a stupid comment. I mean if you want to assume every t9ime a QB has a 3 game slump they suck or are not good any more then fine the only problem is you would have to say every QB in the league including Brady, Manning, Rodgers suck. Like I said stupid comment.
GeekHawk":1h6u72co said:Sorry Lymon, that was a transparent and not very good attempt at trolling those guys. Why are you trolling the main forum, anyway? It does nothing good for the community at large, and if it amuses you then you should get a new hobby.
hawkfannj":1hh98ck1 said:Dude just ain't got it . When he acualy throws the dam ball it's too high or in the dirt wtf is wrong with this guy.