Seahawks trade pick #31 to... THE NINERS?!?

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,913
Reaction score
458
Seahawk Sailor":2npt2wdf said:
Of note: DE Takkarist McKinley is the player the Falcons targeted with that move up. For future trade value reference.

I can't say they'll regret it.
 

vonstout

Active member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
538
Reaction score
77
I wouldn't be surprised if the trade down again. 3 OL guys left along with Foster, King, and Wilson.
 

rjdriver

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
1,638
Location
Utah
Either Lamp or Foster will be available. I would be estatic with either!

Foster is a Beast.
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
Seahawk Sailor":2nfsjulg said:
MontanaHawk05":2nfsjulg said:
We now have FOUR third-round picks. #90, 95, 102, and 106.

Also: We now have SIX of the top 106 picks in the draft.

And we got a 3rd and a 7th for moving down five places. The Packers got a 4th for moving back four places.
What is the salary of a third round pick going to be this year? Can we fit six third round contracts under our cap?
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
vonstout":3jvqkt57 said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the trade down again. 3 OL guys left along with Foster, King, and Wilson.
The idea is to get a starter not put another butt on the bench.
 

emurri

Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
488
Reaction score
19
Hey, John if you keep trading down maybe you could own all the picks in the 7th!
 

edogg23

Well-known member
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
68
brimsalabim":1ygdf0p5 said:
vonstout":1ygdf0p5 said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the trade down again. 3 OL guys left along with Foster, King, and Wilson.
The idea is to get a starter not put another butt on the bench.
I think they should have grabbed King with 31.
 

mikeak

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
8,205
Reaction score
29
Location
Anchorage, AK
brimsalabim":t0v7bmbo said:
vonstout":t0v7bmbo said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the trade down again. 3 OL guys left along with Foster, King, and Wilson.
The idea is to get a starter not put another butt on the bench.


Tell that to the FO

Lose out on what many thought was a top 10 guy so we can get a fourth round pick

Sure we may not have graded him as high but our strategy this year is he same as the last few AND it is not working
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,913
Reaction score
458
We're now picking five times in a 21-pick span. #90, #95, #102, #106, #111. We're behind the Pack again, though, but only by one pick.
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
John Snyder is crazy. Our competition is adding starters while we are trading back to add depth? How many picks can we even afford to sign under the cap?
 

nash72

New member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
832
Reaction score
0
I understand the 1st trade but not the 2nd. We're going to end up with fodder.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,913
Reaction score
458
emurri":2dh59btv said:
Hey, John if you keep trading down maybe you could own all the picks in the 7th!

Or own all the teams in the NFL, by going to the Super Bowl.
 

Latest posts

Top