The end of football will look like this.

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
Sgt. Largent":20z1d4yu said:
Uncle Si":20z1d4yu said:
Perhaps thats where the game goes. Limit offensive line play and reduce pads?

It's already headed in this direction. Every new "point of emphasis" based rule is moving towards minimizing dangerous contact.

- hitting a defenseless receiver
- putting all your weight on QB
- no initiating contact with helmet
- protecting runners who "give themselves up"
- new kickoff rules

So this all is moving towards a more rugby or seven on seven style of "safer" football. I know some people hate that, they love the old school forearm shiver break your opponents will style, but as this article states, as well as even the league offices now dealing with massive class action CTE and injury lawsuits state.........something has to give for football to continue.

Two ways to possibly react to this idea:

1. Get mad at football for changing and find nothing satisfactory to fill that football shaped hole in your soul
2. Learn to enjoy the game of Rugby more in supplement to watching football.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,650
Reaction score
1,672
Location
Roy Wa.
Well we could sue for injury to arms in baseball and softball, makes people irritable and dysfunctional in later years from not being able to masturbate properly and for the correct length of time.

I am sure the Insurance industry would balk at having to pay out for pumps and vibrators.
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
fenderbender123":oin22hj3 said:
We just need to change things up so that people are responsible for their own health.


More responsible for the risk is where its headed
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
chris98251":3tdhitjc said:
Well we could sue for injury to arms in baseball and softball, makes people irritable and dysfunctional in later years from not being able to masturbate properly and for the correct length of time.

I am sure the Insurance industry would balk at having to pay out for pumps and vibrators.

If you knew that throwing a 12 to 6 curve 50 times a week would later lead to masturbation struggles... would you accept the risk
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,612
mrt144":2zhkvkse said:
Sgt. Largent":2zhkvkse said:
Uncle Si":2zhkvkse said:
Perhaps thats where the game goes. Limit offensive line play and reduce pads?

It's already headed in this direction. Every new "point of emphasis" based rule is moving towards minimizing dangerous contact.

- hitting a defenseless receiver
- putting all your weight on QB
- no initiating contact with helmet
- protecting runners who "give themselves up"
- new kickoff rules

So this all is moving towards a more rugby or seven on seven style of "safer" football. I know some people hate that, they love the old school forearm shiver break your opponents will style, but as this article states, as well as even the league offices now dealing with massive class action CTE and injury lawsuits state.........something has to give for football to continue.

Two ways to possibly react to this idea:

1. Get mad at football for changing and find nothing satisfactory to fill that football shaped hole in your soul
2. Learn to enjoy the game of Rugby more in supplement to watching football.

I don't think it has to be this drastic.

Even with the most recent rules changes, football is as popular as ever..............because the driving force behind football isn't what we're talking about, it's gambling.

Our own state has a bill in front of WA congress to allow casinos to have sportsbooks. So the appetite for gambling on football isn't shrinking, it's growing.

So IMO whatever version of football we're watching in 20-30 years isn't going matter, as long as we still get to play fantasy football and gamble on games.

Is that "evolving" or "devolving" is certainly up for debate, but football isn't going anywhere.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
Sgt. Largent":3ifs0mv2 said:
mrt144":3ifs0mv2 said:
Sgt. Largent":3ifs0mv2 said:
Uncle Si":3ifs0mv2 said:
Perhaps thats where the game goes. Limit offensive line play and reduce pads?

It's already headed in this direction. Every new "point of emphasis" based rule is moving towards minimizing dangerous contact.

- hitting a defenseless receiver
- putting all your weight on QB
- no initiating contact with helmet
- protecting runners who "give themselves up"
- new kickoff rules

So this all is moving towards a more rugby or seven on seven style of "safer" football. I know some people hate that, they love the old school forearm shiver break your opponents will style, but as this article states, as well as even the league offices now dealing with massive class action CTE and injury lawsuits state.........something has to give for football to continue.

Two ways to possibly react to this idea:

1. Get mad at football for changing and find nothing satisfactory to fill that football shaped hole in your soul
2. Learn to enjoy the game of Rugby more in supplement to watching football.

I don't think it has to be this drastic.

Even with the most recent rules changes, football is as popular as ever..............because the driving force behind football isn't what we're talking about, it's gambling.

Our own state has a bill in front of WA congress to allow casinos to have sportsbooks. So the appetite for gambling on football isn't shrinking, it's growing.

So IMO whatever version of football we're watching in 20-30 years isn't going matter, as long as we still get to play fantasy football and gamble on games.

Is that "evolving" or "devolving" is certainly up for debate, but football isn't going anywhere.

Don't make me throw myself off this football shaped ledge, man!
 
Top