What is/was holding this team back the most?

What is/was holding this team back the most?

  • Aging Defense

    Votes: 3 3.7%
  • Lack of Cap Space/Draft Picks

    Votes: 6 7.3%
  • Offensive Line

    Votes: 32 39.0%
  • Xs and Os Coaching/Playcalling

    Votes: 31 37.8%
  • Lack of Overall Talent

    Votes: 3 3.7%
  • Russell Wilson's Contract :P

    Votes: 7 8.5%

  • Total voters
    82
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
81
Reaction score
4
I think the offensive line and health issues.

The OL goes without saying but the injury thing is downplayed by negative minded people, and the simple fact is, when you invest so heavily into Pro Bowl worthy players like Sherman, Chancellor, Avril, Bennett, Thomas and they have considerable amounts of time out, it's going to have an affect. They're irreplacable and then you had lesser players like Shead, Carson and others spending time off the field, how can they be replaced? All teams have injury concerns and sometimes you can get unlucky and it affects your best talent, like it did with the Seahawks, and then it's bound to cost you a couple of wins here and there. A fully fit Sherman or Chancellor are game changers and they're the difference between a 25-22 loss and a 18-22 point win, and that mounts up over the course of a season.

The Seahawks have many problems and things to iron out but had the injury problem not been so severe last year, it would unquestionably have been at least another playoff appearance and that puts into perspective how bad the problems are. If everything stays the same next year but we have fewer injuries and can improve the OLine, it will obviously be the playoffs as a minimum which isn't a bad place to be at.
 

hawkman

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
hawknation2018":3n118t3v said:
hawkman":3n118t3v said:
sdog1981":3n118t3v said:
Superbowl 49. The team never got over it and did not trust the coaching staff after the play call.

Or the team never trusted Wilson after that? The coaches didn’t throw the horrible pass.

So dumb. :34853_doh:

Oh really. You saying it was a good pass? Take off the glasses, reality is a great place.

Surly not a dumb as blaming a coach for what most in the industry felt was a good call under the circumstances.
 

hawknation2018

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
3,082
Reaction score
0
hawkman":3vfqsbo4 said:
hawknation2018":3vfqsbo4 said:
hawkman":3vfqsbo4 said:
sdog1981":3vfqsbo4 said:
Superbowl 49. The team never got over it and did not trust the coaching staff after the play call.

Or the team never trusted Wilson after that? The coaches didn’t throw the horrible pass.

So dumb. :34853_doh:

Oh really. You saying it was a good pass? Take off the glasses, reality is a great place.

Surly not a dumb as blaming a coach for what most in the industry felt was a good call under the circumstances.

This is what Wilson saw when he threw the pass (as demanded by the idiotic play call):
how-the-seahawks-threw-away-the-super-bowl-in-just-48-seconds.jpg


The pass itself would have hit Lockette in the hands.
ScqfQcJnYVyn4pBiISRYh63v9wyXCcb4RTWehvz61dbKVDGjfa

The last thing that was wrong with "the play" was Russell Wilson. You don't let England sucker you into throwing a quick pass to stop the clock, when New England had one of the worst goal line defenses and power rush defenses in the NFL (and the Seahawks had the best, behind Marshawn Lynch). And you certainly don't ask a WR as inexperienced and inconsistent as Ricardo Lockette to make that play.

Thankfully, Darrell "The Idiot" Bevell has finally been terminated, just like he was terminated by the Vikings. The fact that six teams have passed him up for OC roles is quite telling.
 

Str8OuttaSkittles

New member
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
keeping bevell and cable far too long and wasting the draft picks in that time frame trying to turn rocks into diamonds
 

hawkman

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
hawknation2018":12yt4659 said:
hawkman":12yt4659 said:
hawknation2018":12yt4659 said:
hawkman":12yt4659 said:
Or the team never trusted Wilson after that? The coaches didn’t throw the horrible pass.

So dumb. :34853_doh:

Oh really. You saying it was a good pass? Take off the glasses, reality is a great place.

Surly not a dumb as blaming a coach for what most in the industry felt was a good call under the circumstances.

This is what Wilson saw when he threw the pass (as demanded by the idiotic play call):
how-the-seahawks-threw-away-the-super-bowl-in-just-48-seconds.jpg


The pass itself would have hit Lockette in the hands.
ScqfQcJnYVyn4pBiISRYh63v9wyXCcb4RTWehvz61dbKVDGjfa

The last thing that was wrong with "the play" was Russell Wilson. You don't let England sucker you into throwing a quick pass to stop the clock, when New England had one of the worst goal line defenses and power rush defenses in the NFL (and the Seahawks had the best, behind Marshawn Lynch). And you certainly don't ask a WR as inexperienced and inconsistent as Ricardo Lockette to make that play.

Thankfully, Darrell "The Idiot" Bevell has finally been terminated, just like he was terminated by the Vikings. The fact that six teams have passed him up for OC roles is quite telling.

Anybody that has been around football at any level knows that throw needs to be low into the body in that situation. HORRIBLE pass.
 

Steve2222

New member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
1
hawkman":msid6vze said:
hawknation2018":msid6vze said:
hawkman":msid6vze said:
sdog1981":msid6vze said:
Superbowl 49. The team never got over it and did not trust the coaching staff after the play call.

Or the team never trusted Wilson after that? The coaches didn’t throw the horrible pass.

So dumb. :34853_doh:

Oh really. You saying it was a good pass? Take off the glasses, reality is a great place.

Surly not a dumb as blaming a coach for what most in the industry felt was a good call under the circumstances.

How about you don’t blame anyone? **** happens some times. Get over it and on to the next one. I seem to remember Tom Brady torching the LOB that game as well and I don’t see Russell crying about it.

Or how about after the NFCDG against Atlanta in 2012. The defense **** the bed after Wilson dominated that game as a rookie. Instead of crying to the media, Russell had a smile on his face and said he couldnt wait for next year, which the rest is history.

Sorry your role model is a cry baby and not better than Russell Wilson.
 

hawknation2018

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
3,082
Reaction score
0
hawkman":14yyibuw said:
Anybody that has been around football at any level knows that throw needs to be low into the body in that situation. HORRIBLE pass.

Which is why your hero Darrell Bevell ("mastermind" you called him after he was terminated) blamed Ricardo Lockette for the interception: "[Lockette] could have done a better job staying strong on the ball."

Nevermind the fact that Ricardo freaking Lockette never should have been put in that position in the first place. Bevell was predictably inept. And now he's toast! Bye, Felicia!

:irishdrinkers:
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
3,849
Reaction score
1,261
I went with play calling, but the Jimmy Graham trade was the straw that broke our dominate run. Jimmy is a "me" first guy. This was a "team" first... "we all we got, we all we need" beast. Jimmy's impact on the run game was so negative that is was almost like we were playing 10 on 11.

We all watched the games. Ask yourself, when did the run game die? ...when Jimmy joined the team. Go back to the historic run that Russell Wilson had in 2015 - that came after Jimmy was injured. We were 5 - 5 going into the game when he was injured and lost for the season. We went 5-1 the rest of the season. While he was here we tried to put a square peg into a round whole - we should have played him outside completely away from the line of scrimmage and away from the run game.
 

Uncle Si

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
20,596
Reaction score
3
Pack it in.

The sniping is overbearing. Discuss the points in the thread without the sewing circle insults
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,256
Reaction score
3,125
Location
Spokane, WA
All of the above options contributed to last season's shortcomings, and the overhaul this offseason.

If I was to blame one issue it would be "complacency" by the front office and coaching staff. They felt like keeping the same band together for six plus seasons was going to work forever, when in actuality teams were able to diagnose our team's weaknesses through personnel and scheme.

The franchise, from the front office to coaches were too stubborn to adjust, and became stagnant while other teams passed them by.

This offseason, we're finally taking a pit stop and retooling. They'll get this thing back on the track and have a new plan of attack going forward.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
I really wanted to answer coaching but to me both Graham and Harvin trades were interesting ideas that ultimately failed to yield anything close to their value. So I put lack of draft picks as the answer. An extra 2nd and 3rd for two years could have yielded some talent and positions of need that we're currently dealing with and possibly averted taking the most inefficient path to mediocrity in 2017.

Bah, it's just so hard to choose one though.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
mrt144":id1f8b39 said:
I really wanted to answer coaching but to me both Graham and Harvin trades were interesting ideas that ultimately failed to yield anything close to their value. So I put lack of draft picks as the answer. An extra 2nd and 3rd for two years could have yielded some talent and positions of need that we're currently dealing with and possibly averted taking the most inefficient path to mediocrity in 2017.

Bah, it's just so hard to choose one though.

And now 10 minutes later about, I'm thinking, naw, it WAS the coaching that was passive and reactive instead of proactive. I get trying to draw down variance into a few key inflection points, I truly do, but I've seen mummies in egypt with more life in them.
 

Shanegotyou11

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,369
Reaction score
381
I don't think the players got over the SB loss. I think blowing the lead and the play call that led to a pick all snowballed.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
hawknation2018":1ok1loqg said:
The last five draft classes.
Yep, this and dumb decision making. From hanging onto underperforming offensive coaches WAY TOO LONG, to reaches/projects in the draft, to paying bad FA’s way too much (see any O-lineman, Lacy), to cutting one of your best players (when healthy) and he signs with a hated rival and you get zero in return. This FO needs to pull their heads out of their butts and quIck, because it’s not trending well for them.
 

purpleneer

New member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
331
Reaction score
1
Location
The Green Lantern (almost)
chris98251":2eg8g31s said:
We stopped evolving and being creative, the NFL is a copy cat league as you all know, they adapted to us and we stayed constant, Pete's stubbornness about the offense and not holding Cable and Bevell accountable lost the teams belief in accountability and his message, at least those there that day.

Then we started getting cute with our picks and signings rather then drafting proven commodities.

To get his system back on track he has to jettison the players that doubt him now and cost a lot.


Jerhawk":2eg8g31s said:
All of the above options contributed to last season's shortcomings, and the overhaul this offseason.

If I was to blame one issue it would be "complacency" by the front office and coaching staff. They felt like keeping the same band together for six plus seasons was going to work forever, when in actuality teams were able to diagnose our team's weaknesses through personnel and scheme.

The franchise, from the front office to coaches were too stubborn to adjust, and became stagnant while other teams passed them by.

This offseason, we're finally taking a pit stop and retooling. They'll get this thing back on the track and have a new plan of attack going forward.
Ding ding ding. I'm not as certain as Jer on the retooling being done right, but expecting to win the same way (with one adjustment that didn't really make sense) was the problem. Mixing in youth wasn't done right and they continued to value volume in drafting when all that did was basically draft for other teams.
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
Everyone but Wilson’s contract should be an option. We are in hock because we have committed so much of our cap to players who are injured and can’t play to their contracted potential if at all. ... and of course the online / blocking scheme / lack of x/o skill by the staff.
 

Seanhawk

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,819
Reaction score
0
Steve2222":2d1rw1si said:
Health, OL, Blair Walsh, way too many stupid penalties like offsides and personal fouls, Off field distractions like protesting (whether you agreed with it or not, yes they were still distractions) and a few players on the team no longer with us who couldn’t let SB 49 go.

Reasons why the Seahawks miraculously won 9 games last year: Russell Wilson

I refuse to include Blair Walsh. If he is competent, then we are possibly in the playoffs and the status quo is likely maintained (i.e. Cable and Bevell). I say raise his jersey to the rafters. A shake up was needed.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,204
Reaction score
1,807
The top two reasons are well identified here by those of us who watch.

PC was sold a bill of goods by Coach Fable and finally woke up to realize that even after adding Duane Brown the OLine still sucked couldn’t pass protect or run block and even after firing Coach Sherman Smith the “running game Coordinator” had coordinated only an absolutely epic fail. Coach Bevell should have been shown the door right after XLIX. Keeping him hurt the team and put Pete’s message out there as being a double standard with different rules for coaches than players.

The players moved out look as well to be the guys who weren’t buying in to Pete’s message, although cap, age and injury limitations certainly were major factors. It clearly was time for a reset.
 
OP
OP
A

adeltaY

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR
OL cost us a ring, I'm certain of it. Defense should rightly be pissed but nothing we can do about it. If the OL magically improves under solari without much personnel change, I'm Def making a cable thread in the shack. I'll be happy and furious.
 
Top