We definitely shouldn't be ignoring the positive hidden in this tweet. From a pure physical tools perspective Battle has the potential to be an outstanding tackle. The knocks on him coming out of college were lack of anchor and that he didn't handle coaching, particularly hard coaching, well. The athletic ability and physical tools were there.Jville":2c383811 said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/bcondotta/status/1024016583964778496[/tweet]
Lets be sure to ignore Bob Condotta's positive recognition of Isaiah Battle. It is just so hard to recognize anything positive from a tweet. And please avoid any references to the whole of what an offensive line coach might say. That would only rekindle another round of "coach speech" dismissals.
Junkies of ridicule unite. Nominations for ridicule are now open for 2018.
:34853_doh: Such a waste of an informative tweet.
When Battle initially came over I was cautiously optimistic. The Seahawk culture and Pete's style seem to be a good fit for a guy like Battle. I also believe he was approximately 20 pounds heavier than his college playing weight.
From what we know of Solari and what he is looking for at each position, working Battle at RT hints at the possibility that the anchor issue is either reduced or no longer an issue. If Solari's coaching can be effective for Battle, this may turn into a great pickup for the team. I have been assuming the plan was to develop Battle at LT behind Brown for the next couple of years. If he is forcing his way onto the field that is a good thing. My interpretation of Battle working at RT with the first unit is that he has matured to the point that he is coachable, and gotten stronger with improved pad level.