RolandDeschain":30bo6tyj said:
I'm not old enough to remember that era, to be honest. I was born in 1982. The rise of passing that started in the late 80s/early 90s is what I started with. I mean, I know in general terms what you're referring to, but I don't have the same perspective on it...But we've all seen the aftermath of the style of play from the 70s and 80s, and it had to stop.
With respect to downfield contact, that was the norm in the old days and if everybody is on point with that (not just 2012/2013 Seattle) then it's all good and a better product.
It is Peyton Manning's fault, two times now. The Super Bowl wasn't the first time this came up.
Sometime around 2003-2004 (maybe earlier), Bill Polian complained to the NFL that the Patriots DBs were too physical and rough making it hard for the golden boy. So there is a noticeable difference between the passing game now and say 2002.
As far as physical punishment is concerned, I've seen the counter argument that if you can slow a receiver down a bit he will probably be less susceptible to some of the bigger hits than when he's roaming free.
It's a bit of gray area. Of course it's nice to show concern for player's health, but I don't know if there's any real proof we are going to legislate the game to a point where we can eliminate all health risks. It would be like trying to protect boxers from getting hit in the head.
If anybody is really serious about CTE, maybe we go back to leather helmets so nobody can lead with the head, EVER. Maybe Brandon Jacobs is still in the league because he doesn't get his thigh smashed into by a helmet in a pre-season game.
The reality is we live in a more litigious society, and marketing unfortunately trumps all else.
The NFL doesn't truly give a s**** about player safety.....only enough to protect itself from lawsuits and maybe public perception.
The average lukewarm "fan" prefers 51-45 Cardinals/Packers versus 23-17 Seahawks/49ers.
Those are the realities of the game today.