hawknation2015":2vdfcx1h said:Wilson's agent may be playing hardball, but Wilson himself let us know a few key pieces of information in his recent ESPN interview about how he is personally feeling about these negotiations: he would like a deal done before the season starts, he would like to play his whole career in Seattle, and he wants his contract negotiations throughout his career to stay private.
What about that sounds like a guy who would ever holdout (i.e. miss off-season workouts, practices, or games) over a contract negotiation? That would be the most extreme and public negotiation tactic he could possibly take. And it would do more harm than good by sacrificing the team-first image he has so carefully cultivated. It would be like using a nuclear weapon during the Cold War . . . Mutually Assured Destruction.
He's making 8% of what he should be making this season; not only is he not holding out, he is actually organizing trips to Hawaii for 7 on 7 workouts with the team. Now imagine that he is making around $20 million under next year's exclusive franchise tag. Why would he risk a public demonstration like holding out under those circumstances? I don't see it.
several reasons, for one a 1 year tag deal doe snot give him the long term deal he wants. For 2 it also leaves him with no leverage. He would risk it to get the long term deal he wants, and at that point it would be easy to do and keep face especially if the hawks do not make a fair offer. At some point he will need to think of himself, other wise he will get taken advantage of. No one who really understands the business side of the NFL would hold it against Wilson. If it came to that it would look just as bad for the team as it would Wilson. Lynch can hold us for ransom 2 years straight and gets what he wants, but the franchise Qb does not. Bennett not being at the camp actually helps Wilson stance. The bigger question is why would the hawks risk him doing that?