Since I'm not in Seattle, I listen to national radio much more than local radio. Yesterday, at least, there was quite a bit of discussion about how including g UW in the playoffs shows teams they shouldn't schedule tough non-conference opponents. There was so much belly aching about Penn State not getting in because Penn State scheduled Pittsburgh. Pitt? Seriously?
What annoyed me was there was almost no discussion of how perhaps Ohio State was included largely because of their victory over Oklahoma. Once again, rather than focusing on any positives, the talking heads have to focus on the negative.
On top of that, there is plenty of belly aching that it should be an 8 team playoff instead of four. Never mind that we have 4 team system to replace the 2 team system we had before. And we'd still get the same belly aching with an 8 team playoff. And just like with the 8 team playoff, it doesn't matter because Alabama is clearly a class above the rest of college football.
What annoyed me was there was almost no discussion of how perhaps Ohio State was included largely because of their victory over Oklahoma. Once again, rather than focusing on any positives, the talking heads have to focus on the negative.
On top of that, there is plenty of belly aching that it should be an 8 team playoff instead of four. Never mind that we have 4 team system to replace the 2 team system we had before. And we'd still get the same belly aching with an 8 team playoff. And just like with the 8 team playoff, it doesn't matter because Alabama is clearly a class above the rest of college football.