Kryten":15viyfzj said:
False? We are agreeing. I said it would have been automatically reviewed. But then they changed it, which cost us.
The way I am reading it, you are saying the the officials WANT to have it officially reviewed, but they were "idiots" because it did just the opposite of that desired outcome. I don't think that they had any desire to have it reviewed. That is where I think it is a misconception (perhaps better than just false, but I was on my phone and I like to be as brief as possible when posting from my phone).
I believe an official with not as good a view as the official who made the call pushed harder for his opinion instead of just taking the call as it was. I think officials know exactly the consequences of their overturning the call meant. The official who made the original call should have been allowed to stand.
I'm all for officials conferencing to get a call right, but when thy conference and change a correct call to an incorrect call, there is just no reason for it. If you aren't 100% you shouldn't try to overturn another officials call. If you are 100% sure you are right and you end up being wrong, then as an official, you need to reevaluate why you are so certain you are right about a call that another official has the better view on and perhaps consider not trying to override his decision.