jmahon316
New member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2017
- Messages
- 778
- Reaction score
- 0
Only 1 expert picked Packers over Seahawks @ CBS
- Thread starter jmahon316
- Start date
John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
At BR they all picked GB.
SeAhAwKeR4life
Well-known member
Two of them have changed to Packers and of all 8 of them they have picked right just 7 times in total. These guys record with picks alone does not bode well for us. :34853_doh:
Good thing they have to actually play the game to find out though right? :mrgreen:
Good thing they have to actually play the game to find out though right? :mrgreen:
I would think the Packers would be favored in Green Bay so it bothers me not that anyone picks the Packers. I think we can pull it out, but I won't be surprised in the least if the Packers win the game.
Sports Hernia
Well-known member
I wouldn’t exactly call little Petey Pissquick an “expert”.
SanDiego49er
Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2013
- Messages
- 571
- Reaction score
- 1
I think you can beat them and may. They also can beat you. Green Bay at home is pretty good and they are not hugely banged up. Your team has a lot of injuries right now and obviously is on the road. If you were healthy and playing at your house I think it's almost a guarantee you win. But injured and on the road at their house Green Bay can win. I don't really think Green Bay is as good as their 13 - 3 record indicates. Their division is soft compared to the NFC West where every game is a war.
Mad Dog":o1ttrx77 said:
With that group?
My feelings exactly.
RolandDeschain
Well-known member
If it makes you feel better, here's ESPN, NFL.com, and Bleacher Report all picking the Packers.Aros":2va7hudv said:
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/v ... tions-more
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... eded-49ers
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/287 ... ons#slide6
lukerguy
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2012
- Messages
- 2,320
- Reaction score
- 20
SanDiego49er":234y86yt said:
So deep.
SanDiego49er
Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2013
- Messages
- 571
- Reaction score
- 1
lukerguy":4ik8g8zm said:
You cut out everything in my post and just took a very small part. Read the whole thing. There is more in there.
:roll:
Seahawk_Dan
Well-known member
I know I'll sleep better.RolandDeschain":308qypr0 said:If it makes you feel better, here's ESPN, NFL.com, and Bleacher Report all picking the Packers.Aros":308qypr0 said:
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/v ... tions-more
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... eded-49ers
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/287 ... ons#slide6
Seahwkgal
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 5,102
- Reaction score
- 205
Yet two of them are in the final 8. Half that division is bad but half is stellar. This is a very tough game and I will be SHOCKED if we win but very, very happy if we do.SanDiego49er":3bajxi6o said:
SantaClaraHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 15,007
- Reaction score
- 3,088
It all depends on what version of GB shows up.
They've choked massively in some of their games. The Chargers and 49ers come to mind. They should have lost the first Lions game in anyone's estimation; it's just that Clete Blakeman called not one but two phantom facemasks because Bakitari went and whined at the refs. I probably watched all or most of the games on cable, and those calls were the most egregious.
Blakeman is reffing the SEA@GB game, so not only do we have to pull it out but it has to be so decisive that Blakeman cannot mess with it. With our OL injuries, that's going to involve more quick passing and especially Russ running, same as in Philadelphia. Maybe more packages involving Shaquem for speed factor, but then there have got to be guys next to him who can finish the job.
They've choked massively in some of their games. The Chargers and 49ers come to mind. They should have lost the first Lions game in anyone's estimation; it's just that Clete Blakeman called not one but two phantom facemasks because Bakitari went and whined at the refs. I probably watched all or most of the games on cable, and those calls were the most egregious.
Blakeman is reffing the SEA@GB game, so not only do we have to pull it out but it has to be so decisive that Blakeman cannot mess with it. With our OL injuries, that's going to involve more quick passing and especially Russ running, same as in Philadelphia. Maybe more packages involving Shaquem for speed factor, but then there have got to be guys next to him who can finish the job.
hawkfannj
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,771
- Reaction score
- 160
Hmmmm interesting indeed.
SantaClaraHawk":1oxckut8 said:
Everyone was crying the blues for us after the PHI game, where we lost on blatant uncalled PI, so at most that would cancel the DET game, at most.
In reality, DET was handed a free 7 points on a turnover on downs in the goalline that was initially ruled a TO before being inexplicably changed to TD with no deliberation by the refs, and then only stood upon replay due to "original call on field" bullcrap. Just cause Booger MacFarlane didnt tantrum about it doesnt make it not count lol.
The first and more consequential of those illegal hands to face was correct, and the NFL stood by it anyway, it was just illegal contact rather than hands to the face. Our LT was punched in the throat, clear call.
LastRideOut
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 1,448
Seahawks have to play the Packers AND the refs if the first GB-Lions game is any indication. Kind of worries me.
Seahawkwalt1967
Active member
LastRideOut":1mk12hjd said:
If the refs are going to be one sided, I think it’s for the Hawks. I think a Hawks Niners game is what the league would want for ratings.
