NINEster":3gg1gxh1 said:"Another piece of the puzzle to get to Wilson" - Trent Baalke speaking to Tim Kawakami
kearly":1zngwn1a said:I see Buckner as being a bit like a rookie Frank Clark. Makes a lot of splash plays that are nice, but is a ways off from being a 10 sack guy.
JSeahawks":3iesxqx2 said:kearly":3iesxqx2 said:I see Buckner as being a bit like a rookie Frank Clark. Makes a lot of splash plays that are nice, but is a ways off from being a 10 sack guy.
I think it's opposite. He's going to bring it 100% of the time and will work his way into 10 sacks. But he makes very few "wow", splash plays. I think it's a very good pick by sf, he's everything armstead was supposed to be.
He's better against the run then he is as a pass rusher, IMO.
Maulbert":2d8xht10 said:JSeahawks":2d8xht10 said:kearly":2d8xht10 said:I see Buckner as being a bit like a rookie Frank Clark. Makes a lot of splash plays that are nice, but is a ways off from being a 10 sack guy.
I think it's opposite. He's going to bring it 100% of the time and will work his way into 10 sacks. But he makes very few "wow", splash plays. I think it's a very good pick by sf, he's everything armstead was supposed to be.
He's better against the run then he is as a pass rusher, IMO.
:sarcasm_on: Because, you know, your opinion of him is SUPER unbiased. :sarcasm_off:
Not saying he won't be good, but I just don't trust your judgment on Oregon players.
kearly":1f0g1tte said:I see Buckner as being a bit like a rookie Frank Clark. Makes a lot of splash plays that are nice, but is a ways off from being a 10 sack guy.
JSeahawks":1muo5y9y said:Maulbert":1muo5y9y said:JSeahawks":1muo5y9y said:kearly":1muo5y9y said:I see Buckner as being a bit like a rookie Frank Clark. Makes a lot of splash plays that are nice, but is a ways off from being a 10 sack guy.
I think it's opposite. He's going to bring it 100% of the time and will work his way into 10 sacks. But he makes very few "wow", splash plays. I think it's a very good pick by sf, he's everything armstead was supposed to be.
He's better against the run then he is as a pass rusher, IMO.
:sarcasm_on: Because, you know, your opinion of him is SUPER unbiased. :sarcasm_off:
Not saying he won't be good, but I just don't trust your judgment on Oregon players.
When have I ever said a duck was going to be great in the nfl? I was high on kiko, he was rookie of the year. I was high on mariotA, he looks good.
I said I wouldn't touch dion Jordan who went 3rd overall, I was right on that one. I said I wouldn't take armstead before the 3rd round, that's yet to be determined.
I'm total homer when they're still in Eugene, but I've been pretty much right on as far as ducks in the nfl. Lamichael James is the one I missed on, I thought there would be a spot for him.
Maulbert":10ecj9x4 said:Nothing personal. I just call it as I see it. And you can't deny that Chip Kelly has done nothing on the NFL level to justify your blind optimism involving his coaching ability. Yeah, he won 20 games his first 2 seasons, but with Andy Reid's guys, and Andy Reid went on to turn a 2-14 Chiefs team into an 11 game winner, so I have trouble believing that 4-12 season was all his fault. Plus, when Kelly faltered, Philly immediately went back and grabbed Reid's top disciple.
:snack: WOW! JS you feeling ok?JSeahawks":2apn23dv said:Maulbert":2apn23dv said:Nothing personal. I just call it as I see it. And you can't deny that Chip Kelly has done nothing on the NFL level to justify your blind optimism involving his coaching ability. Yeah, he won 20 games his first 2 seasons, but with Andy Reid's guys, and Andy Reid went on to turn a 2-14 Chiefs team into an 11 game winner, so I have trouble believing that 4-12 season was all his fault. Plus, when Kelly faltered, Philly immediately went back and grabbed Reid's top disciple.
Chip Kelly is dead to me. (Although I'd still like to see what he could do with a good qb. Just don't give him control over personnel)
Yeah, isn't he on Marvin s "No Fly" list?dadof3":rkw27lsy said:I thought Kawakami wasn't allowed to talk to the front office
Tech Worlds":2aaku4un said:Do you have a link? I'd like to read it all.
CPHawk":2aaku4un said:He won't get 10 sacks, but it won't be because he's not capable. He's playing in a terrible scheme for DE to get any sacks.
IndyHawk":7w0v6gs5 said::snack: WOW! JS you feeling ok?JSeahawks":7w0v6gs5 said:Maulbert":7w0v6gs5 said:Nothing personal. I just call it as I see it. And you can't deny that Chip Kelly has done nothing on the NFL level to justify your blind optimism involving his coaching ability. Yeah, he won 20 games his first 2 seasons, but with Andy Reid's guys, and Andy Reid went on to turn a 2-14 Chiefs team into an 11 game winner, so I have trouble believing that 4-12 season was all his fault. Plus, when Kelly faltered, Philly immediately went back and grabbed Reid's top disciple.
Chip Kelly is dead to me. (Although I'd still like to see what he could do with a good qb. Just don't give him control over personnel)