CandlestickBum
New member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2012
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 0
253hawk":1di44zu1 said:1. TB had a perfect storm 2nd quarter with turnovers and short fields. What'd they do in the second half? 3 points. Offensive juggernauts. They came out playing like a team with nothing to lose but we adjusted to that.
2. The NFCW has the highest winning % in the NFL and the Rams took major advantage of us being out 3 starting linemen with their stud edge rushers. They may be the 'worst' in the division, but their record is only 10th worst in the league.
Seattle's offense was extremely pedestrian and vanilla this week compared to the past couple of weeks. No read-option and no deep passes where Russ has lit it up better than anyone. Bevell went super-conservative for whatever reason. Lots of drive-killing penalties on plays that went for first downs, too. If one of those went the distance, that's a 10 point swing given the fire sale SF had with FG's.
San Francisco normally scores 24 points per game and Seattle 28. Those stats might underrate the San Francisco offense though, since most of the games this year were played without a first-string #1 or #3 receiver. Seattle and San Francisco only allow an average of 15 and 16 points per game respectively. Just going by pure statistics, this is the type of score you would expect, which was probably pretty accurately reflected in the three point spread. The reason both offenses had a hard time scoring was likely largely due to the opposing defenses.
And have you ever considered why Seattle was not running as many read options? Once a QB goes into the read option, they become eligible to be legally hit, even if they hand off the ball (assuming that they are acting as if they are holding on to it for a run). San Francisco has some of the fastest guys behind the defensive line in the NFL, and you better believe that at least one of them is always keeping an eye on a QB like Wilson, ready to hit him as hard as possible if he looks to be trying to run to the line. Do you really think a good coach would want their QB to take unnecessary risks in a game that they could lose without affecting their seeding, especially against some of the fastest and hardest hitting defenders in the NFL?
I doubt it, at least not if Carol is as smart as his team's record seems to indicate.
I would love to see the 49ers coaching staff unleash Kaepernick like they were confident doing when they had Alex Smith as a backup, but I understand why they rarely use read option or designed QB runs anymore. There is a time and place for going all-in, no matter the risk of injury, and that time and place are the games you HAVE to win. Seattle probably will not see any of those games until the second round of the playoffs. You better believe that both the 49ers and the Seahawks have been planning all year and have a bunch of things up their sleeves they have been holding back on.