silverss
New member
Yes - please take our Toronto Raptors!!
True, but with that floating turd that is Howard Lincoln running things the M's won't be watchable until that POS is gone.seahawksfan28":lbgvfb5y said:NBA team: No, NHL team: Yes for sure. But the way that league is run you may have a lockout every 7 years.
Tech Worlds":2hpeke2n said:I would trade the mariners for a pile of dog doo.
Hawkfan77":yht77ott said:I love the Sonics but no. Not a chance.
It's funny though, once the Mariners start winning in two years all your "yeses" will change...
Hawkfan77":1uepbmrs said:I love the Sonics but no. Not a chance.
It's funny though, once the Mariners start winning in two years all your "yeses" will change...
Not as long as Lincoln is in charge and Mr.Hawkfan77":35uq2o59 said:I love the Sonics but no. Not a chance.
It's funny though, once the Mariners start winning in two years all your "yeses" will change...
pinksheets":369keuo7 said:It's fun to dismiss everything the M's do and to write off everyone who says "they're going to be good in a couple years", but that's just silly. There is a lot to be excited about within the M's organization. Do the owners and the execs suck? Yeah, but we've been pumped about Seattle teams before with awful ownership, that's almost a Seattle tradition. Unless you're going to be a giant payroll team, which the M's will likely never be even with a new owner, it takes a good long while to build a team.
For some fans 162 games is great but I am not a fan of the marathon that is the mlb season.Seaman":1uhjid8x said:sammyc521":1uhjid8x said:MLB is also crap. 162 games and then possible another 28 more?
Really, it can take up to 190 games to determine who is the best?
Heaven forbid that we as sports fans have more sports to watch!!!