Our Man in Chicago
New member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 0
(My apologies for passing along incomplete information. At the edge of my seat at the time, along with all of you. So happy right now.)
After reading your post before this and this one I have to my put my 2 cents in.Gayle Sayers was clearly on another level before getting hurt,he did things that nobody has done since and that was in a era where there were not many rules to prolong or protect and the fact is he was voted in extra early(The only one)Earl Campbell the one who wore tear away jerseys so he could gain extra yards and Td's never made it to the SB.Who can forget the shot Jack Tatum delivered that knocked him out and into the end zone.The players who know and understand the game Voted Easley in and it is only right.The man clearly stood out on the field.The injury he suffered and no SB was not his fault.A Hof Ronnie Lott said Easley was the best and even better than him so that alone should be good enough for any doubters.RiverDog":zi7fkc53 said:chris98251":zi7fkc53 said:That's why he is getting in on the Veterans committee or whatever it's called, modern day players would not survive in his era long, they are to big of pussies, they think about the money mostly and not the game, won't play with a hang nail many times etc, not all there are still some throw backs, we have a lot on our team, but look around the league, toughness isn't across the board anymore. There are also the tough guys that are whiney bitches, looking at you Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady.
I've gone through this exercise every time Easley's name has come up for HOF consideration. There has only been one post merger HOF inductee, Earl Campbell at 8 seasons vs. Easley's 7, with a career that didn't span at least 10 seasons, but his name was much more widely recognized than Easley's is. Also add into the equation that Easley never played in a Super Bowl, which at times can be used as a justification to admit a player that otherwise wouldn't have met the unwritten standards.
If Easley does make it, the HOF would be lowering the bar and forced to consider names they've previously rejected, for example Bert Jones or may have to reject in the future due to career longevity. Plus you have to ask this question: How many players, for example Shaun Alexander, might have made the HOF had their careers ended at 7 seasons? That's the argument Easley's candidacy is going to have to overcome.