gowazzu02
New member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 1,911
- Reaction score
- 0
Have I missed something? I just read the times article about Carson/Adams injuries, and he wasn't mentioned. Has he been activated from PS yet?
PNW":3p1rxhfj said:I get Pete taking care of our guys, but aren’t these division games the most important games for us to win??? We could lose to Buffalo and still be in decent shape if we take care of division rivals.
Especially after dropping our first one the AZjmahon316":2nfl7fkt said:PNW":2nfl7fkt said:I get Pete taking care of our guys, but aren’t these division games the most important games for us to win??? We could lose to Buffalo and still be in decent shape if we take care of division rivals.
I was thinking the same thing, quite honestly. Division games are wayyy more important.
PNW":1a2xospe said:I get Pete taking care of our guys, but aren’t these division games the most important games for us to win??? We could lose to Buffalo and still be in decent shape if we take care of division rivals.
I said I get Pete taking care of our guys, as in I get it. We have a tough game tomorrow, if we lose to the niners winning the division could be pretty tough. Snacks isn’t injured and Pete said he had his best week of practice yet and made it sound like he was going to get some playing time against SF. Another DT would certainly help relieve our rotation and give Snacks much needed actual playing time to get in actual game ready shape, we all know what no preseason has done injury wise league wide, it’s important to slowly get guys ready to help prevent possible injuries.jamescasey1124":32b69gmk said:PNW":32b69gmk said:I get Pete taking care of our guys, but aren’t these division games the most important games for us to win??? We could lose to Buffalo and still be in decent shape if we take care of division rivals.
They are not more important than players being ready on game day l. He will be there when needed at Pete's discretion. If he is not ready reed, poona, mone and collier, rush have handled it so far. Our weakness is coverage. Not sure what the hurry is.
PNW":3q45mrfl said:I said I get Pete taking care of our guys, as in I get it. We have a tough game tomorrow, if we lose to the niners winning the division could be pretty tough. Snacks isn’t injured and Pete said he had his best week of practice yet and made it sound like he was going to get some playing time against SF. Another DT would certainly help relieve our rotation and give Snacks much needed actual playing time to get in actual game ready shape, we all know what no preseason has done injury wise league wide, it’s important to slowly get guys ready to help prevent possible injuries.jamescasey1124":3q45mrfl said:PNW":3q45mrfl said:I get Pete taking care of our guys, but aren’t these division games the most important games for us to win??? We could lose to Buffalo and still be in decent shape if we take care of division rivals.
They are not more important than players being ready on game day l. He will be there when needed at Pete's discretion. If he is not ready reed, poona, mone and collier, rush have handled it so far. Our weakness is coverage. Not sure what the hurry is.
Haha, well I’m glad he’s on board either way. Go Hawks!!!KitsapGuy":1b6qwe24 said:How about hearing from the man himself? He must be reading this forum. :lol:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/gbellseattle/status/1322720863423135744[/tweet]
KitsapGuy":1tfj9b8z said:I like a player who gives the fans an honest take on things. :thumbup: