Identity on offense by doing it Pete Carroll’s way

JPatera76

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
6,297
Reaction score
4,719
LTH":9kq6n516 said:
Salk: Seahawks found their identity on offense by doing it Pete Carroll’s way


https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1517595/ ... rolls-way/


I say I like this, I like this a lot... this is the way its supposed to be. Pete Carroll is the coach of this team and if he is going to be criticized and possibly fired he might as well do it his way...

I don't think Wilsons job is to be the OC... I say shut up and do your job Russell...


LTH
I’ve definitely had stupid posts….but your post and constant defense of PC is well beyond the stupidity my posts have reached.

PC way, with this talent Post LOB and POST LYNCH, has been laughable at best. I say Shut up PC and let Waldron and Russell do their job. But that only happened once.. in the Colts game. Since then the PC way hasn’t done anything but waste talent, rah rah hype crap players (Tre Flowers, Penny, Jamal Adams etc etc) and Trust and defend your very sub par and utterly shit DC KNJ… and crap Defense. Of course your response to this will fall I line with your typical responses of, some PC defense, Homerism and some masked attack due to disagreeing. But none the less. PC needs to really shut up and go the Holmgren route and retire because the games passed him by.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
kthebestwayw":2c1idjn8 said:
what we are seeing is our o-line playing their best football in years. we are able to run the ball very effectively but unfortunately our OC isn't the best at scheming. he needs to be better at setting up the offensive and making the defense think we are going one way and then we go another way. especially on third down

.ahh our OLine is not playing well at all. Our qbs have been sacked 18 times already. And once again we are tops in yards after contact. That means the oline is not doing a.good job. We are ranked 25th. That's not good.
 

ZagHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
176
JPatera76":9gwhdipm said:
LTH":9gwhdipm said:
Salk: Seahawks found their identity on offense by doing it Pete Carroll’s way


https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1517595/ ... rolls-way/


I say I like this, I like this a lot... this is the way its supposed to be. Pete Carroll is the coach of this team and if he is going to be criticized and possibly fired he might as well do it his way...

I don't think Wilsons job is to be the OC... I say shut up and do your job Russell...


LTH
I’ve definitely had stupid posts….but your post and constant defense of PC is well beyond the stupidity my posts have reached.

PC way, with this talent Post LOB and POST LYNCH, has been laughable at best. I say Shut up PC and let Waldron and Russell do their job. But that only happened once.. in the Colts game. Since then the PC way hasn’t done anything but waste talent, rah rah hype crap players (Tre Flowers, Penny, Jamal Adams etc etc) and Trust and defend your very sub par and utterly $h!t DC KNJ… and crap Defense. Of course your response to this will fall I line with your typical responses of, some PC defense, Homerism and some masked attack due to disagreeing. But none the less. PC needs to really shut up and go the Holmgren route and retire because the games passed him by.

He'll bring up that you need to read PC's philosophies and acknowledge the history of his success...just that HISTORY vs recent success.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
ZagHawk":mm3ojqmz said:
JPatera76":mm3ojqmz said:
LTH":mm3ojqmz said:
Salk: Seahawks found their identity on offense by doing it Pete Carroll’s way


https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1517595/ ... rolls-way/


I say I like this, I like this a lot... this is the way its supposed to be. Pete Carroll is the coach of this team and if he is going to be criticized and possibly fired he might as well do it his way...

I don't think Wilsons job is to be the OC... I say shut up and do your job Russell...


LTH
I’ve definitely had stupid posts….but your post and constant defense of PC is well beyond the stupidity my posts have reached.

PC way, with this talent Post LOB and POST LYNCH, has been laughable at best. I say Shut up PC and let Waldron and Russell do their job. But that only happened once.. in the Colts game. Since then the PC way hasn’t done anything but waste talent, rah rah hype crap players (Tre Flowers, Penny, Jamal Adams etc etc) and Trust and defend your very sub par and utterly $h!t DC KNJ… and crap Defense. Of course your response to this will fall I line with your typical responses of, some PC defense, Homerism and some masked attack due to disagreeing. But none the less. PC needs to really shut up and go the Holmgren route and retire because the games passed him by.

He'll bring up that you need to read PC's philosophies and acknowledge the history of his success...just that HISTORY vs recent success.


Ahh PCs history as a Hc without Wilson sub 500. With Wilson almost 700.
 

OrangeGravy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
384
LTH":vxhylybd said:
TwistedHusky":vxhylybd said:
Well so far doing it Pete's way without Wilson, they get the identity of losers.

And Pete gets the identity of someone that would have been lucky be anything past a .500 coach without Wilson.

So maybe it is working.

Pete Carroll's way should be to let Wilson win it for him and stop screwing things up by meddling with simplistic and completely boneheaded gameplans.

Not sure how you came to that conclusion but Pete Carroll's way is running the ball... i can tell u didn't read the article...the fact that he has been compromising might be the reason the Seahawks have not had the success they have had in the past offensively and it is a factor of why the D has not been successful ( a factor not the only reason)


LTH
I will say my main criticism of Pete is compromising his style to placate Russell. I understand the temptation, but if you're gonna do it, you have to go all the way. He tried to make Russell happy and by doing so got caught in between the 2 philosophies. Worst place to be. I think it's the big reason they lost a handle on the roster building aspect. Big mistake trying to be something you're not. Gotta be true to yourself.
It's also why they should have traded Russell before the last contract renewal if he didn't want to buy in. I happen to think that style suits Russell's strengths perfectly, but alas, he doesn't. It's a hard sell to the fan base, but trading him then would've garnered the best return . My friend was trying to convince me back then that we should trade him, but I vehemently disagreed. In hindsight, it was the perfect time
 

OrangeGravy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
384
TwistedHusky":302mixne said:
You are correct on running the ball, for most teams.

Run blocking is easier for an OL. It is less physically taxing. Great run blockers are easier to find.

Totally makes sense.

BUT

The NFL has shifted the rules to favor passing offenses and passers.

And when you have a great QB, (which is rare enough to see a franchise get a HOF QB once or twice in their existence) then you have to review things.

You cannot take a generalist approach when you have a specialist and one of the best at the position.

Then you leverage the rules and strengths afforded to you toward the benefits/advantages the league affords you over most of the rest of the NFL. (Or you can be old, dumb, and stubborn.)

Perfect balance when your strength is passing does not make sense EVEN IF YOUR STRENGTH IS PA PASSING.

Because PA works even if they know you are passing.

The reason Pete wants to run the ball is because it is cheap but it does not help you in the playoffs, because your advantage was your QB and you refused to build your focus on that.

You build your attack on where you have the advantages. That Pete refuses to acknowledge this and keeps trying to force gameplans regardless of personnel - tells me he is too old figure it, too old to learn, and too old to ever change.

He would have forced the run whether he had Barry Sanders, Joe Montana, TJack, or Tom Brady. Because he cannot learn, adjust or adapt anymore. All he can do is try to force what worked before.


PS It didn't work. They lost. Just in case anyone forgot. I predicted this. Keeping games close while still losing and looking like you 'could have won' is vintage TyBall. And Carroll is morphing into the 2nd coming of Ty Willingham but for the NFL. Right down to all teh talent squandering & cluelessness.
Running the ball well doesn't help you in the playoffs? That QB passing the ball a lot hasn't worked yet
 
OP
OP
L

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
1,013
JPatera76":1ypjm60j said:
LTH":1ypjm60j said:
Salk: Seahawks found their identity on offense by doing it Pete Carroll’s way


https://sports.mynorthwest.com/1517595/ ... rolls-way/


I say I like this, I like this a lot... this is the way its supposed to be. Pete Carroll is the coach of this team and if he is going to be criticized and possibly fired he might as well do it his way...

I don't think Wilsons job is to be the OC... I say shut up and do your job Russell...


LTH
I’ve definitely had stupid posts….but your post and constant defense of PC is well beyond the stupidity my posts have reached.

PC way, with this talent Post LOB and POST LYNCH, has been laughable at best. I say Shut up PC and let Waldron and Russell do their job. But that only happened once.. in the Colts game. Since then the PC way hasn’t done anything but waste talent, rah rah hype crap players (Tre Flowers, Penny, Jamal Adams etc etc) and Trust and defend your very sub par and utterly $h!t DC KNJ… and crap Defense. Of course your response to this will fall I line with your typical responses of, some PC defense, Homerism and some masked attack due to disagreeing. But none the less. PC needs to really shut up and go the Holmgren route and retire because the games passed him by.


You are like way diluted...u have no basis to back up what you are saying just a bunch of mouth service and basic rhetoric that u read off of somebody else's post... and u call me stupid? At least I back my claims up with something.. your the Idiot! What a moron!!


LTH
 
OP
OP
L

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
1,013
John63":3gelw2nu said:
LTH":3gelw2nu said:
TwistedHusky":3gelw2nu said:
Well so far doing it Pete's way without Wilson, they get the identity of losers.

And Pete gets the identity of someone that would have been lucky be anything past a .500 coach without Wilson.

So maybe it is working.

Pete Carroll's way should be to let Wilson win it for him and stop screwing things up by meddling with simplistic and completely boneheaded gameplans.

Not sure how you came to that conclusion but Pete Carroll's way is running the ball... i can tell u didn't read the article...the fact that he has been compromising might be the reason the Seahawks have not had the success they have had in the past offensively and it is a factor of why the D has not been successful ( a factor not the only reason)


LTH


I have read the article and Twisted's statement stands. PC is a sub 500 coach in his career without Wilson. that a fact AS to the running the ball, okay and it got us what? A loss that what. A loss against one of the worse offenses in the league and defense missing 2 of its starting d lineman. As to the whole shut up Wilson thing, Ahh he is the starting Qb it is his job to voice his opinion period. FY there has been no compromise at all. All you need to do I look at the half of football we don't play. All the rest is nothing more than you and the writers trying to deflect from the only constant PC, there is the problem.

All that aside I agree we need a run game but the problem is, when we run we show the run play. FYI we are avg 23 runs a game and only 20 passes. Were avg 110 rushing per game. we are rushing problem is we're not consistent enough and with our defense, we cannot commit to giving it more attempts



What ever...

Running the ball is exactly what they need to do... they were very effective vs Pitt...no matter how you choose to characterize it...

Oh but all that aside now after you trash the Seahawks run game, you agree that they need a run game... LMAO!!! come on man... give me a friggen break!!! LMAO!!!! lets see what happens now that it looks like the Hawks have committed to the run...

We're going to see Dallas and Penny some now that Collins is out...lets see what happens if they establish the run early and control TOP...

lets see if that doesn't give the D some fresh legs and lets see if the D starts making more plays..

lets see if the run game opens up some nice pass opportunity's for Geno... betcha they beat the Saints and I betcha they do it exactly the way Carroll wants to do it with the run game...

take some pressure off of Geno because the truth is he doesn't have to be Russell Wilson all he has to do is take advantage of the reasonable opportunities he is given and manage the game effectively. With a good run game Geno doesn't have to make spectacular plays he just has to be good...


LTH
 

Tinamedina

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
Fade":ac1pc55z said:
Waldron got hijacked by Pete. Week 2 or 3 postgame Pete said that Shane Waldron is open to the things that they've been doing around here.

Go back and watch the week 1 offense. It looks nothing like you've seen since, outside of a few plays here and there.

im glad im not the only who sees it. Waldron was given the colts game and pete carroll has put the cuffs on waldron ever since, thats why the offense looks so disjointed and out of place. Carroll is a real problem and liability at this point. Carroll is sabotaging his own team at this point by not letting waldron do his job.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
John63":2zh0h8ni said:
keasley45":2zh0h8ni said:
JayhawkMike":2zh0h8ni said:
So we have one halfish of looking good doing it Pete’s way. And the next teams aren’t going to see that and (I know it’s weird but) adjust? If we do against the Saints what we did 2/3 of the second half we will likely look more like we did at the end of the game after they adjusted. I loved when we picked up Collins and how he ran Sunday. I just don’t think it’s enough.

If they do adjust we have a counter. The issue to date is that the counter to the 2 deep safety looks has been... crickets. We have yet to commit to the run the way we should. Instead, we've continued to try to drop back and rely on big plays from DK and Lock. If / when defenses do decide to bring a safety down, well then we can exploit the opening that creates in the secondary, and we have a beast of a TE to do that, plus DK and Lock.

I do think part of what's been holding the offense back is an adherence to the big play over logical play. Against the Steelers , we started the game trying to nickel and dime against a team that had a great pass rush and wouldn't allow us to get settled. I think we stayed there as long as we did because thats the way the offense has been drawn up when Russ is in in terms of how much we lean on the run. The difference when RW is playing though is rather than getting a reliable rushing play of 4 or 5 yards, we will take a pass and if it's covered, Russ will extend and make a play. But this makes us reliant not on a strategy, but solely on Russel's talent. And the challenge there is that Russ can't win us every play to sustain drives and that kind of play doesnt force defenses to do anything else but contain Russ and take away the longer developing deep plays to basically 2 of 5 potential wr targets (Tyler and DK).

In every game we've played, our offense has either played well but been either figured out by the half, or hasn't functioned unless Russ has manufactured magic off script - the 9ers game comes to mind ( the scramble TD and the spin / escape and TD pass). That's why there's been the talk about the lack of identity. We don't have one. We need one. Pete just waited too long to change it Sunday night.


Bit your whole premise of all we do is drop back and throw long is wrong and has been proven, FUind the thread about passing charts you will see that we have been passing short a lot more than long. So sorry that stance is factually wrong. What has been holding the offense back is 1 penalty, 2 inconstancies in playcalling and design, and little adjustments.

Literally everyone in the NFL knows we don't have an effective short to middle passing attack. Continuing to reference a chart that shows that we do pass short doesn't address the fact that those passes and the mid to short middle ATTACK isn't one we deploy with any great success. There were also charts that showed how relatively ineffective we were at that range as compared to Stafford and the Rams.

If I say we don't run the ball effectively or consistently that's a fact. Referencing charts that show that we do in fact run isn't the point. Yeah we run. But it's conspicuously missing as a component of the offense that makes defenses adjust and actually yields an identity or generates rhythm.

And you don't need charts. All you have to do is look at how defenses play us. If we were good at it, they'd be adjusting to defend it, but they don't. They sit high, knowing we won't commit to the run or consistently attack a vast portion of the field unless it's a broken play. The plan against us has been the same now for two years. Take away the deeper outs, sideline passes and long game and contain Russ when he improvisers. Oh, and then crash down on the occasional WR screens.

We don't use TEs
We don't run consistently
We dont attack the short middle consistently or effectively enough to make defenses care

I dont know how anyone could look at this offense and say otherwise.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
And the constant quote about Pete being a bad coach without Wilson ignores real world facts just as much as the chart references do. Seattle is the first place he coached where he was given control of the team. He didn't have that prior.

And what he did here even before Wilson had the team on a positive trajectory and achieving more than they should have. He inherited an over the hill Matt H and then got T Jack and his OC when he settled on the profile of qb he wanted. Somebody who could live behind a still evolving o-line and not just stand back in the pocket and get clobbered. So he got Wilson. So to make it sound as if Wilson just walked into town and said, hey coach, you guys suck, let me help you out is about as backwards as claiming belicheck isn't actually a HOF coach because he doesn't have Brady. I'd put money on the chances that even if Brady never played in NE, Belichick would have eventually found a qb and still found success. Why? Because he was smart enough to find Brady. Just Pete was smart enough to find Wilson. Not saying the results would have been the same exactly, but successful leaders create success. It's not accidental or bestowed upon from 'up above'.

And for the record, I get just as frustrated with him as I do RW for his unwillingness to adjust his philosophy to fit his players. He's been stubborn in that regard - frustratingly so. But the guy is an all-time great football coach.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,913
Reaction score
1,102
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.
 

misfit

Active member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
667
Reaction score
32
Time to stop romanticizing 2013

What you need is balance. Marshawn isn't walking through that door. The carson contract was a bad idea, and its obvious.

The Russ defenders or at least I'm not saying to throw the ball 60 times a game, you also don't have to run it all game either. But going back to the 2013 offense is not a proper utilization of talent or how this team is set up. Pete is not an offensive mastermind and needs to get out of the way.

I do think a run heavy approach is probably better suited while Geno is starter, but not when Russ comes back.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
I dont think anybody is romanticized anything. There are some here that look at last year as one that was sabotaged by Pete after mid-season by not letting Russ Cook. There are others that think he brought balance to a one sided,foundering attack.. If the start of this season has shown anything on Offense its that when the plays go through the hawks qb (pass over run over and over to the same players on similar routes) you get at best a half game of predictable, positive play. And absent someone stepping and saying 'stop the nonsense' like he did Sunday or talked last season about doing, all youbget is the same old hawks. Great yards for half a game. Solid highlights for ESPN. And then drives that stall over and over.

And the defense has been remarkably bad, but again, as evudenced by solid play when they weren't made to be on the field more than they were responsible for themselves. 9ers our offense sucked for the majority of the game, D was solid in the first half. Rams - D was better than average in the first half. Steelers- again, solid performance and got the stops when needed. It's a long season. And there more going on on in this team than xs and os. It's obvious that there is continued friction between Pete and Russ and that's nit helping the dynamic of the team or the performance on the field.

12-4 Last year. And if yiu want to cry about hiw Pete sabotaged the game, do yourself a favor and get the all 22 through ngl game pass and watch it. We dint lose that game because of Pete. If there was a way to post the entire game clip of all-22 without being fined out the butt I would. The games this year have been no less telling.
 
OP
OP
L

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
1,013
TwistedHusky":1m1gtrn0 said:
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.


I think your not considering the content in Keasleys post... He has explained this perfectly in everyway I can see. He has brought some legitimate points that you are not acknowledging the validity of what he is saying. Instead you are planning your response to refute his point with out acknowledging where he is correct...nor proving where he is wrong in your opinion.

Aros brought up a great point in a past post. he said something like everybody has there own expectations of what success is and he is right...that being said, what exactly are your expectations record wise for Carroll? Do you expect him to win the SB every year?


LTH
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
TwistedHusky":2vmjk0wi said:
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.

I dont agree with the notion that he has nothing to give. Nor do I agree that his plan is to find physically superior athletes. To understand Pete you sometimes need to listen to the guy talk about life in general. His strategy is to develop men who ultimately play at the peak of their ability because of the connection that he helps foster on the team amonsgt his players via leadership that's based more on EI than physical measurables or exotic xs and os. And that's a difficult thing to do. But it's why we've had success and why, most recently, we've been challenged. Pete's way is to give his team a strategy that's uncomplicated at its core, and allow his players to 'own ' it and make ot unique to them. That's what he did with the legion of boom and that's what he's been thinking would have happened by now.

I honestly think one of the challenges with his way is the time it takes to 'convert' players to that mindset. So players like Jamal Adams, as talented as he might be and 'bought in', he also brings a certain freelancing way that is way outside the way he needs to function within the system and can unintentionally upset team balance. But he's a great player and by all accounts, working to assimilate. And it seems as though outside of his stone hands, he's getting better. And yeah, he was here last year but is now being asked to play more true safety. So he's a major contributor and out of position in a way. Then you have Belour, Barton, Reed (was playing the wrong side), Jones, Tre, Taylor... its basically a different enough defense that it's been almost built from scratch this year. And the magic that is needed for it to work, is the players playing together, knowing it like the back of their hands, and then letting it rip.

On offense... Pete and Russ are a great match philosophically, but Pete wants a Ryan Tannehill, and Russ wants to put up numbers and a resume that place him among the best ever. He doesn't want to be another Terry Bradshaw (multiple superbowls but never discussed in the context of the best all-time). And the way Russ needs to go about finding success and fulfilling his personal accomplishments aren't easy to build into a balanced offensive attack the way the team wants to be structured. And now Pete's given Russ the reigns and the result has been an offense and qb that want to hit big plays all day at the expense of playing solid, situational, complimentary football.

So the players on defense haven't yet come to own the system in the way that will allow them to flourish. And the offense has been left to do what Russ and Waldron want, but not necessarily what's sustainable for itself or functional in the context of the team.

I'm not defending Pete or trashing Russ. Just looking at the situation without picking sides or just looking at the situation and taking it at face value based on stats. It's far more complex than most have a tolerance to try to understand and has been for a while.
 
OP
OP
L

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
1,013
keasley45":1tod1h0o said:
TwistedHusky":1tod1h0o said:
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.

I dont agree with the notion that he has nothing to give. Nor do I agree that his plan is to find physically superior athletes. To understand Pete you sometimes need to listen to the guy talk about life in general. His strategy is to develop men who ultimately play at the peak of their ability because of the connection that he helps foster on the team amonsgt his players via leadership that's based more on EI than physical measurables or exotic xs and os. And that's a difficult thing to do. But it's why we've had success and why, most recently, we've been challenged. Pete's way is to give his team a strategy that's uncomplicated at its core, and allow his players to 'own ' it and make ot unique to them. That's what he did with the legion of boom and that's what he's been thinking would have happened by now.

I honestly think one of the challenges with his way is the time it takes to 'convert' players to that mindset. So players like Jamal Adams, as talented as he might be and 'bought in', he also brings a certain freelancing way that is way outside the way he needs to function within the system and can unintentionally upset team balance. But he's a great player and by all accounts, working to assimilate. And it seems as though outside of his stone hands, he's getting better. And yeah, he was here last year but is now being asked to play more true safety. So he's a major contributor and out of position in a way. Then you have Belour, Barton, Reed (was playing the wrong side), Jones, Tre, Taylor... its basically a different enough defense that it's been almost built from scratch this year. And the magic that is needed for it to work, is the players playing together, knowing it like the back of their hands, and then letting it rip.

On offense... Pete and Russ are a great match philosophically, but Pete wants a Ryan Tannehill, and Russ wants to put up numbers and a resume that place him among the best ever. He doesn't want to be another Terry Bradshaw (multiple superbowls but never discussed in the context of the best all-time). And the way Russ needs to go about finding success and fulfilling his personal accomplishments aren't easy to build into a balanced offensive attack the way the team wants to be structured. And now Pete's given Russ the reigns and the result has been an offense and qb that want to hit big plays all day at the expense of playing solid, situational, complimentary football.

So the players on defense haven't yet come to own the system in the way that will allow them to flourish. And the offense has been left to do what Russ and Waldron want, but not necessarily what's sustainable for itself or functional in the context of the team.

I'm not defending Pete or trashing Russ. Just looking at the situation without picking sides or just looking at the situation and taking it at face value based on stats. It's far more complex than most have a tolerance to try to understand and has been for a while.

Yep... that's EXACTLY what's happening on multiple levels... where are you getting your information from or are u just figuring it out on your own? You have a really nice style of stating things I am jealous LOL very nice insightful honest post!!


LTH
 

OrangeGravy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
384
LTH":3n7rssvi said:
keasley45":3n7rssvi said:
TwistedHusky":3n7rssvi said:
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.

I dont agree with the notion that he has nothing to give. Nor do I agree that his plan is to find physically superior athletes. To understand Pete you sometimes need to listen to the guy talk about life in general. His strategy is to develop men who ultimately play at the peak of their ability because of the connection that he helps foster on the team amonsgt his players via leadership that's based more on EI than physical measurables or exotic xs and os. And that's a difficult thing to do. But it's why we've had success and why, most recently, we've been challenged. Pete's way is to give his team a strategy that's uncomplicated at its core, and allow his players to 'own ' it and make ot unique to them. That's what he did with the legion of boom and that's what he's been thinking would have happened by now.

I honestly think one of the challenges with his way is the time it takes to 'convert' players to that mindset. So players like Jamal Adams, as talented as he might be and 'bought in', he also brings a certain freelancing way that is way outside the way he needs to function within the system and can unintentionally upset team balance. But he's a great player and by all accounts, working to assimilate. And it seems as though outside of his stone hands, he's getting better. And yeah, he was here last year but is now being asked to play more true safety. So he's a major contributor and out of position in a way. Then you have Belour, Barton, Reed (was playing the wrong side), Jones, Tre, Taylor... its basically a different enough defense that it's been almost built from scratch this year. And the magic that is needed for it to work, is the players playing together, knowing it like the back of their hands, and then letting it rip.

On offense... Pete and Russ are a great match philosophically, but Pete wants a Ryan Tannehill, and Russ wants to put up numbers and a resume that place him among the best ever. He doesn't want to be another Terry Bradshaw (multiple superbowls but never discussed in the context of the best all-time). And the way Russ needs to go about finding success and fulfilling his personal accomplishments aren't easy to build into a balanced offensive attack the way the team wants to be structured. And now Pete's given Russ the reigns and the result has been an offense and qb that want to hit big plays all day at the expense of playing solid, situational, complimentary football.

So the players on defense haven't yet come to own the system in the way that will allow them to flourish. And the offense has been left to do what Russ and Waldron want, but not necessarily what's sustainable for itself or functional in the context of the team.

I'm not defending Pete or trashing Russ. Just looking at the situation without picking sides or just looking at the situation and taking it at face value based on stats. It's far more complex than most have a tolerance to try to understand and has been for a while.

Yep... that's EXACTLY what's happening on multiple levels... where are you getting your information from or are u just figuring it out on your own? You have a really nice style of stating things I am jealous LOL very nice insightful honest post!!


LTH
Keasley45 hits it right and I think it's easy to see if you aren't driven by any agenda. The Pete/Russ thing is pretty plain to see. I don't have a problem with what Russell wants to do. I do question whether or not he actually believes it's the best way to win championships or if it's the best career hedge in a sport that's extremely diffult to win it all in even I you do everything right. It's definitely not the best way to build the best possible team in my opinion. His best Chance at playing the way he wants AND winning it all isn't gonna be in Seattle, Pete or no Pete. Seattle's best chance is Pete running his style with a bought in Russell allowing the roster to be built appropriately. I say that assuming Pete isn't going anywhere whether I agree with that or not.

From Russell's perspective I get it also. If he's being honest with himself, the odds aren't in his favor no matter what happens. His best path is to put up numbers that guarantee his place on the list of greatness and hope for another ring. He's got the hard part done. 1 ring. I wouldn't be surprised if his agent advises him in this direction. More numbers, more fame,more money. If he truly thinks he can win 4,5,6 rings, I applaud the confidence but he's delusional. Even the best talent the world's ever seen would need the stars to align for that to manifest. I'm convinced Brady had a little meeting at the crossroads to get his rings.
 
OP
OP
L

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
1,013
keasley45":xsdoxs3n said:
TwistedHusky":xsdoxs3n said:
Your key word is WAS. Carroll WAS a good coach.

Buddy Ryan was a great DC. The 46 defense was impossible to stop, until it was easy. Then it didn't work at all.

Carroll had a system that worked. And he doesn't have anything else.

But he brings a lot of favoritism, nepotism, control-freakism to offset that. And frankly a complete inability to be an effective gameday coach in terms of tactics/strategy.

I am not joking or taking potshots, or even being hyperbolic when I say he has nothing of value to contribute anymore.

An idea can be a dangerous thing when it is the only one you have. And that is Carroll. He has one idea, and it worked for him, it does not work now and he will cling to it until he dies. (or drives the team into the ground trying).

Carroll used to do talent arbitrage*. And it worked. Find tremendously athletic players that do not fit NFL measurables, which makes them cheap. Then find ways of building a system around them that allows their strengths to flourish and weaknesses to be offset. It worked.

But then for some reason, instead of realizing it was the approach and players that made him successful, he began to think it was the system he built for those other players. And he rigidly enforced the system regardless of the players. So we get Homer running up the middle for 1-2 yds in a home playoff game against the Rams.

Carroll had a great idea. It might even still work if he bothered to do what he originally did. But instead he focuses on a type of football that does not work, except against weaker opponents.

Now he flat out flipped to TyBall. Which is like worshipping at the pantheon of terrible coaches. He WAS a good coach. He ISN'T anymore. And he was NEVER a good gameday coach.






* A lot of this was likely Scott or someone on Scott's team, because Scott put All Pros/Alternates on almost every team he ended up on.

I dont agree with the notion that he has nothing to give. Nor do I agree that his plan is to find physically superior athletes. To understand Pete you sometimes need to listen to the guy talk about life in general. His strategy is to develop men who ultimately play at the peak of their ability because of the connection that he helps foster on the team amonsgt his players via leadership that's based more on EI than physical measurables or exotic xs and os. And that's a difficult thing to do. But it's why we've had success and why, most recently, we've been challenged. Pete's way is to give his team a strategy that's uncomplicated at its core, and allow his players to 'own ' it and make ot unique to them. That's what he did with the legion of boom and that's what he's been thinking would have happened by now.

I honestly think one of the challenges with his way is the time it takes to 'convert' players to that mindset. So players like Jamal Adams, as talented as he might be and 'bought in', he also brings a certain freelancing way that is way outside the way he needs to function within the system and can unintentionally upset team balance. But he's a great player and by all accounts, working to assimilate. And it seems as though outside of his stone hands, he's getting better. And yeah, he was here last year but is now being asked to play more true safety. So he's a major contributor and out of position in a way. Then you have Belour, Barton, Reed (was playing the wrong side), Jones, Tre, Taylor... its basically a different enough defense that it's been almost built from scratch this year. And the magic that is needed for it to work, is the players playing together, knowing it like the back of their hands, and then letting it rip.

On offense... Pete and Russ are a great match philosophically, but Pete wants a Ryan Tannehill, and Russ wants to put up numbers and a resume that place him among the best ever. He doesn't want to be another Terry Bradshaw (multiple superbowls but never discussed in the context of the best all-time). And the way Russ needs to go about finding success and fulfilling his personal accomplishments aren't easy to build into a balanced offensive attack the way the team wants to be structured. And now Pete's given Russ the reigns and the result has been an offense and qb that want to hit big plays all day at the expense of playing solid, situational, complimentary football.

So the players on defense haven't yet come to own the system in the way that will allow them to flourish. And the offense has been left to do what Russ and Waldron want, but not necessarily what's sustainable for itself or functional in the context of the team.

I'm not defending Pete or trashing Russ. Just looking at the situation without picking sides or just looking at the situation and taking it at face value based on stats. It's far more complex than most have a tolerance to try to understand and has been for a while.

I think you bring up an interesting point about understanding Pete ... Pete says a lot of things that people and the media can not relate to about the attributes he stresses in his program.its obvious to me watching his press conferences... because of the follow up questions they ask... there are a couple of them that get it kinda of but the majority do not...Pete's like say what? And he teases them about it subtley and they don't know where it's coming from which I think is kinda funny...

Edit:

Pete Carroll is an extremely complicated man and I in no way claim to completely understand his thought process as he is very different in the way he approaches things with his team, with football and as you said... in everyday life. He is a very interesting person...


LTH
 

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,242
Reaction score
2,193
Pete Carroll's ideal offense is a fossil that belongs to the stone age. I'm not talking about just running the ball either. It's a relic of the 70s, it's not a good offense for the modern NFL era.

The passing routes concepts ignore the short middle of the field and don't put much of an emphasis on the short passing game. The running game concepts are extremely basic and elementary. Most of the routes are sideline routes that are intermediate or deep. It's sole purpose seems to be eliminating the toxic differential.

That is all fine and dandy if you have a good defense. We do not have a good defense to lean on. Even when we did it turned every game into nail biters.

Honestly I wish Pete Carroll would stay the hell away from anything involving the offense. He's been nothing but a boat anchor around the offenses neck.
 
Top