John63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2018
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reaction score
- 149
Maelstrom787":1tq00ukg said:John63":1tq00ukg said:vonstout":1tq00ukg said:John63":1tq00ukg said:again what good is a safety when the QB has all day due to no pass rush
what good is a safety when your QB is running for his life again.
I love the plaeyrs, hate teh price adn the fact we still have bigger needs
Also Wilson did not get his wich
were is the pass rush, were is the offensive weapons ie 3rd WR, were is the pass protection.
They went into this off season with 4 needs
pass rush
pass blocking
#3 wr option
another RB
we are 1 for 4 that is bad
Hyde had a great year so that checks that box.
Phillip Dorset should be a very good #3 WR so that was filled too
Mayowa, Irvin, and Adams all would have led the Hawks in sacks last year and they drafted 2 DEs that both had good stats in college. I think the rush will be better.
That’s 3 out of 4.
Dorsett is a question mark so not solved.
All olien man picked up our known run blocker sand bad pass blocker,
great they had sacks, but does not so0lve dline issue
sp at best 1 of 4 and thats assuming Hyde can produce in this system, which in itself is a huge issue
Are we going to go through this again with how incorrect your "known run blocker sand bad pass blocker" statements are?
Why does this insidious falsehood keep creeping into every topic?
And yet we were ranked 28th In passing blocking last year so sorry dude fact not falsehood. When you find a FACT showing they are say avg at pass blocking let me know. Until then we will go with the FACT they were bad