Atradees
Well-known member
We have really enjoyed your years of service. Clear out your area of any personal belongings. Please leave your door pass at the front desk. Thank you.
Atradees":atn6ohzl said:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will.
Atradees":2akb7grp said:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us.
Atradees":2cg8bcwo said:We have really enjoyed your years of service. Clear out your area of any personal belongings. Please leave your door pass at the front desk. Thank you.
chris98251":1m0ajod8 said:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
Atradees":rrpr5lq6 said:chris98251":rrpr5lq6 said:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
2_0_6":17ezedxr said:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right? :lol: :lol:
Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.
2_0_6":1bkh3ler said:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right? :lol: :lol:
Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.
chris98251":mqbicw4m said:Atradees":mqbicw4m said:chris98251":mqbicw4m said:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Atradees":22afsoij said:chris98251":22afsoij said:Atradees":22afsoij said:chris98251":22afsoij said:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Maelstrom787":3dl7hdwt said:Atradees":3dl7hdwt said:chris98251":3dl7hdwt said:Atradees":3dl7hdwt said:You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.