The "vax privacy" argument is irrelevant in the nfl

OP
OP
S

SantaClaraHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
15,007
Reaction score
3,088
Spohawks":3lyvlvse said:
Straight up ^^

I'm just pointing out factually what the NFL has decided and has always decided to do in a situation where everyone's a high dollar guy relative to what most people here make.

And both they and their union have jointly fashioned a statement saying that for this year, this is what we're going to do.

Today, the state of California's OSHA came out with new guidance that says dropping the masks and distancing amongst each other is ok as long as you can document that 100 percent of those doing that are. That is where the three teams in the state are starting from by having any sort of negotiation with them about dropping it to at 85 percent, we won't impose that requirement anymore.

And they made up their minds about it anyway for this year. Both the league and the union.

And that rule for players is that if you're vaxed, you can pretty much act like it's 2019. If you elect to remain nonvaxed, then here are the accommodations under which you can play, a la 2020.

They're doing it with the staff too as seen here: https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... ing-rooms/
 
OP
OP
S

SantaClaraHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
15,007
Reaction score
3,088
The latest memo says vaxed players can party at bars and nightclubs. Not unvaxed ones. Further unvaxed players will be prohibited from doing ALL promotions including on social media.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1405226106802872324[/tweet]
 
Top