jamescasey1124":asgrfmsr said:
Ok what about sacks and pressures? It not just in my head. I watch all the games and every play. Brown was beat several times.
Oh and if trading elite talent isnt how you do it then why is everyone asking to trade bobby and the original post talked about Adam's. Hypocritical if you ask me.
Lt is absolutely easy to find and people make excuses for not having one. Yes brown is good. Probably the best on the line we have. Yet, starting fresh on oline is what we need. It's not just a scheming issue and holding the ball. Its pressures and high sack rates that turn into turnovers which has russ holding the ball.
Do you not realize that the argument you're making regarding Brown is even worse than the Wagner argument you're having? "You think the OL is bad now, they'll fall of a f****** cliff" once you cut an elite left tackle for no reason with no suitable replacement.
There's nothing out there to corroborate your basic eye-test recall on Brown. Again, 2 sacks credited to him all year. 87 grade from PFF - his best since 2011.
Don't trust PFF? Okay. Duane Brown was the 2nd best tackle (Left OR Right) in the entire league last year at pass block win rate, per ESPN. 94%. Absolutely elite. For reference, the line as a whole for the season stood at 64% Pass Block Win Rate, good for 9th in the league.
He is EASILY the teams best pass protector, and he's entering the last year of his contract at an absolute bargain for his level of play.
Elite blindside protection is not easily found, and it does not come cheap. Yet, here it is, already present on the Seattle roster for relatively cheap... and your response is to want to get rid of it? Change for the sake of change is not a good thing if you're just throwing valuable players away because "fresh start." Getting rid of that guy
for no good reason doesn't make the line better. It makes it a lot worse.
Also, in other threads I have heavily criticized the idea of trading Wagner, and likely wouldn't trade Adams either. So... no, not hypocritical. In any case, if you're trying to defend the idea of selling low on elite talent just for cap space and draft compensation that almost certainly won't replace said talent, and the thing you chose to defend it was other people having a silly opinion because they're mad and want change... I dunno. You might not have had a strong point to begin with.
Unless, of course, you want to actually justify getting rid of a relatively cheap tackle who, while aging, was the second best tackle in the NFL last season in pass protection and gave up only 2 sacks in a season where he played all 16 games. I'm all ears as to how a "fresh start" would be preferable to that.