Do Not Sell My Personal Information

John Schneider

Discuss your thoughts about anything College Football or NFL draft. Recruiting, Projections, and Mock drafts, Etc. LANGUAGE: PG-13
John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:52 pm
  • We have really enjoyed your years of service. Clear out your area of any personal belongings. Please leave your door pass at the front desk. Thank you.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:54 pm
  • How about you leave instead?

    Frickin' drama queens.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7001
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:57 pm
  • Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us. The tru driving force behind our superbowls was somebody else.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:00 pm
  • Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will.



    12's gonna 12...


    I heard the Ram's bandwagon isn't quite full yet.
    dutchcoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 572
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:19 am


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:04 pm
  • Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us.


    Considering Schneider championed Wilson to Pete and the scouting department, and wanted to take him in the second round where we drafted Wagner, it shows just how little you know. No one thought the 2012 draft was good. Nobody has a crystal ball, least of all you. So stop acting like you're the be-all, end-all of talent evaluation, or quit spouting off like a monkey with a megaphone.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7001
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:06 pm
  • Somebody else. It is plainly obvious.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:09 pm
  • I take it you hated last year's draft? Not enough sexy names to get you going?
    dutchcoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 572
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:19 am


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:15 pm
  • Punter wont get us back to the Superbowl. Or a one dimensional offense. Or 4th and 5th round scrubs picked in the second and third rounds. Wait till Schneider cant stop patting himself on the back for all those additional picks in which he reached on each of them.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:29 pm
  • Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 33347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:31 pm
  • Atradees wrote:We have really enjoyed your years of service. Clear out your area of any personal belongings. Please leave your door pass at the front desk. Thank you.


    Define "we," as you seem to be in the minority here, fella. Tone down the waterworks, sheesh.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:33 pm
  • This guy is 100% a 12. AKA the worst section of our fan base. He’s been ride or die for at least 5 years.
    dutchcoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 572
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:19 am


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:37 pm
  • Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right? :lol: :lol:

    Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.
    2_0_6
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3540
    Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:40 am
    Location: South Seattle


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:43 pm
  • chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.


    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.

    starting to sound like Tim ruskell in here.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:45 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.


    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.


    Do we need to find a taller tree still?
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 33347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:45 pm
  • 2_0_6 wrote:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right? :lol: :lol:

    Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.


    Shut up! You’re making way too much sense.
    dutchcoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 572
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:19 am


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:45 pm
  • 2_0_6 wrote:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right? :lol: :lol:

    Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.


    With 5 more picks, and 12 picks next year - and probably some decent acquisitions in May so they don't count into the compensatory formula to fill out any remaining holes.

    Guys hate when Seattle doesn't take the players they think will succeed at the place they thing they should go (based on garbage media big boards) but it's the name of the game. I'd rather the front office take their guys. I think they probably reached on Collier and Blair, didn't really like Metcalf (but great value), and had Barton in the 5th - but I don't know where guys are going to go.

    Criticism of the pick is fine, but this is just whiny nonsense from Atradees.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:46 pm
  • chris98251 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.


    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.


    Do we need to find a taller tree still?


    Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.

    Tim Ruskell was loved by everyone in initially......


    Every year someone has a temper tantrum and the "Fire (fill in name)" posts begin. Boo Hoo your players weren't drafted by the team, so far none of mine have been either, but I see why JS/PC picked the guys they have so far, and I really like some of the picks. Who would you have picked Atradees? Who have they critically missed?

    In case you missed it this management crew has created a team that is a perennial contender, or annual playoff level team. With the greatest of respect they have done the best job ever in the history of the team since 2010. They are respected highly all around the league.

    Tim Ruskell loved? Hah, maybe by his dog, even then not so much. I doubt he'd have been able to recognize a football player even if that player tackled him. The team had 4 picks when the draft process started those draft, that 4 have became 10 and maybe now 9 so far in a roster situation where the team needed players. This draft they've picked 4 hard nosed players already in the first 3 ounds from an initial possible 2 and now still have 5 picks to go with 4 rounds left. Judge the draft after the whole draft and after these players have played for a few years. Maybe we should have this convo after a few seasons of seeing what the players actually drafted accomplish.

    I could give a ratz rear what grade some draft expert gives to the picks, they don't have roster to manage, cap issues, multiple Pro Bowl players suddenly gone b/c of injury or an inability to be true to their team. it's a lot harder than the talking heads would have you believe. I am curious as to what Jn'P will do today and what the final roster will look like.

    Have a cold one, take a chill pill, mow the lawn, relax in the sun.

    I'm nothing but impressed with the job JS has done this draft. He deserves the 'Trader John' moniker hung on him. Keeping up with the number of trades and the picks the team has had has this draft been a busy job. They are drafting players they like who they think will fit into the roster they know the most about how they want it to look. 5 picks to go.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:48 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.


    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.


    Do we need to find a taller tree still?


    Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.


    Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:49 pm
  • Maelstrom787 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.


    Do we need to find a taller tree still?


    Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.


    Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.


    Why do I have to do that? The results speak for themselves. We are talking 4 years not four picks. Everybody Loved Tim Ruskell initially.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:51 pm
  • I look at the Giants and think, this front office would have KILLED it with that much draft capital.

    The same ones who are mad about today, are the same ones who were upset when we took a guy named Bobby Wagner or long lanky guy named Richard Sherman. I hope they grab another WR in the next couple picks just in case the Doug news is legit.
    2_0_6
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3540
    Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 12:40 am
    Location: South Seattle


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:51 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    Maelstrom787 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:
    Do we need to find a taller tree still?


    Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.


    Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.


    Why do I have to do that? The results speak for themselves.


    What? The results? Like, a winning record every single year and a team with a good nucleus of young talent? Those results?

    They sure do speak for themselves.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:52 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:
    chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
    Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.

    So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.

    Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.


    You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.


    Do we need to find a taller tree still?


    Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.

    Tim Ruskell was loved by everyone in initially......


    Image

    Yeah he is there all by himself making all those calls.

    YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY ON THIS TOPIC NOW.
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 33347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:54 pm
  • RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today. Some other GM would have had better value. This is a clueless deal. Its gone bad its toast.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:56 pm
  • Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.


    Again, then who did?
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:00 pm
  • Maelstrom787 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.


    Again, then who did?


    The picks made today were clueless and awful. You cant, even as a fan pray, that bye miracle of God think they are gonna start or even compete. It could not have been John. NOPE. NO way.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:05 pm
  • Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today. Some other GM would have had better value. This is a clueless deal. Its gone bad its toast.
    ok time to name the one who picked RW.
    toffee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2383
    Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:44 pm


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:14 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    Maelstrom787 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.


    Again, then who did?


    The picks made today were clueless and awful. You cant, even as a fan pray, that bye miracle of God think they are gonna start or even compete. It could not have been John. NOPE. NO way.


    That doesn't answer my question, guy.

    You're just floating crap with nothing to back it up. This is so asinine that it is reaching the limits of belief. Have you been hacked?

    If not, then I'm waiting: Who selected Russell Wilson? Who is the person that overruled the GENERAL MANAGER of the team to select him? Pete Carroll is the only one who could - and he attributes it to Schneider.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:33 pm
  • Atradees wrote:
    Maelstrom787 wrote:
    Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.


    Again, then who did?


    The picks made today were clueless and awful. You cant, even as a fan pray, that bye miracle of God think they are gonna start or even compete. It could not have been John. NOPE. NO way.


    Are you 5? You sound like a spoiled little girl. Cool it on the drama. Enjoy going to the playoffs mos years.
    dutchcoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 572
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:19 am


Re: John Schneider
Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:33 pm
  • Why are we feeding the troll?
    sutz
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 20613
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:41 am
    Location: Kent, WA


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 12:07 am
  • His worst draft was ‘12 by far, we were graded F so has to be legit....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    DJ_CJ
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 481
    Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 5:48 pm
    Location: Cedar Rapids, IA


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 12:52 am
  • My greatest doubter is from Seinfeld........The last good draft. Its time to hire new people. just like Holmgren.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 1:02 am
  • I think you're drunk, Atradees. Time to lay off the sauce, get some sleep (close to a toilet, maybe), and get some Excedrin ready for the morning.
    Ad Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2514
    Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:25 am


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 1:28 am
  • Fun. Attack the Man. Nope. Maybe you are. This draft is over. JUST LIKE Tim Ruskell. But thanx for askin cartoon guy! Of course if thats what u were actually doing or maybe you were talking $h!t like a b!@ch. Woo. I noticed your not from anywhere. Probably your moms basement. I have always liked her.
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3669
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:22 pm
    Location: Ich tu dir weh


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:15 am
  • So far I'm really liking these picks. These players have a very Seahawk-y feel to them and so many people forget that you can be the greatest player in the world but if you don't fit the system, you're not going to go as far as you're hyped to go. I'm very excited about today's draft and who else we pull
    jmahon316
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 628
    Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:59 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 4:44 am
  • JS drives me crazy with some of these picks but at the end of the day we make the playoffs every year. Sure i hated the Barton and that we traded up is crazy to me, Blair and Collier were reaches but at the end of the day there the guys they wanted.
    getnasty
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4610
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:22 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 5:32 am
  • dutchcoug wrote:This guy is 100% a 12. AKA the worst section of our fan base. He’s been ride or die for at least 5 years.


    12s since '12. I hate the 'twelves' designation and could give all f**k about it.
    Slick
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1258
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:52 am
    Location: Woodinville, WA


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:57 am
  • So another option is to just, you know, not feed the trolls.
    HawkGA
    NET Hall Of Famer
     
    Posts: 107409
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:29 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:09 am
  • Unless you have personally worked out or watched tape on every possible pick then your opinion means nothing. If you are basing your opinion of picks on how they line up with the mock or mocks you have seen your opinion means nothing. I have yet to see a mock that comes even close to being completely accurate and I’ve been watching this process for a long time. If you base your opinion of how a team should be built based on mock drafts then you are an idiot. Mock drafts are written by people who ARE NOT in positions of power by NFL teams to make personnel decisions. If you think NFL personnel pay any attention to published mock drafts you may be a bit delusional. Perhaps the teams that are bottom feeders in the NFL pay attention to them but certainly not the teams that finish most every season with a winning record.
    oldhawkfan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2479
    Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:06 pm
    Location: Spokane


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:08 am
  • HawkGA wrote:So another option is to just, you know, not feed the trolls.


    True, Mod, but once in a while it's fun to just :stirthepot: a bit. ;)
    Ad Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2514
    Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:25 am


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:37 am
  • Slick wrote:
    dutchcoug wrote:This guy is 100% a 12. AKA the worst section of our fan base. He’s been ride or die for at least 5 years.


    12s since '12. I hate the 'twelves' designation and could give all f**k about it.


    I hear you man. Have you seen the draft hat this year? The 12 is bigger than the logo.
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6632
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:04 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:58 am
  • Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us. The tru driving force behind our superbowls was somebody else.



    Check out that moon landing as well and is the world really round?
    TreeRon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1283
    Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:48 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:03 am
  • So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.
    JayhawkMike
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 437
    Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:06 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:08 am
  • JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.


    Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6632
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:04 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:10 am
  • Seanhawk wrote:
    JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.


    Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?


    Too easy for these types of posts to call on hindsight.
    Uncle Si
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 19785
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:34 am


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:18 am
  • Uncle Si wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.


    Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?


    Too easy for these types of posts to call on hindsight.


    How's it too easy? No one has played a down yet.
    Seanhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6632
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:04 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:20 am
  • Seanhawk wrote:
    Uncle Si wrote:
    Seanhawk wrote:
    JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.


    Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?


    Too easy for these types of posts to call on hindsight.


    How's it too easy? No one has played a down yet.


    Thats why its too easy. Im agreeing with you that all these negative posts are too easy to make. Even easier is sayiing who they shouldve taken.
    Uncle Si
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 19785
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:34 am


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:10 am
  • JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.

    Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.

    Poorly done draft so far.


    Have enough balls to specifically call out the busts, so far, or do you just generally want to complain?
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:16 am
  • The Hawks came into this draft with 4 picks. JS has maneuvered and has came away with something like 50 picks! What does this mean? He is giving us hope as fans. I love what he has done for this organization and this draft is included.
    BubbaGump
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 441
    Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2018 8:53 pm


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:37 am
  • Love watching the butthurt when someone’s “pet players” don’t get drafted by their favorite team. It’s precious, really.
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 31615
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:36 pm
    Location: The pit


Re: John Schneider
Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:38 am
  • Sports Hernia wrote:Love watching the butthurt when someone’s “pet players” don’t get drafted by their favorite team. It’s precious, really.


    My pet secondary guys have gone to the Saints two drafts in a row - Natrell Jamerson and Chauncey Gardner-Johnson. Both CB/S hybrid players.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3611
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Next


It is currently Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:24 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests