Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will.
Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us.
Atradees wrote:We have really enjoyed your years of service. Clear out your area of any personal belongings. Please leave your door pass at the front desk. Thank you.
chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
2_0_6 wrote:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right?![]()
![]()
Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.
2_0_6 wrote:Because franchises are easy to build and great GM's are readily available around every corner right?![]()
![]()
Go into the draft with 4 picks that turned to 10, and filled the three biggest needs right off the bat.
chris98251 wrote:Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Maelstrom787 wrote:Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Atradees wrote:
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.
Atradees wrote:Maelstrom787 wrote:Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Okay, if you want to play that card, attribute his success to someone else. But give us a name, with actual evidence, otherwise this is just pure assclownery.
Why do I have to do that? The results speak for themselves.
Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Atradees wrote:chris98251 wrote:Hmmm, Needed DE, got one, Needed Safety and or Slot help got one, needed WR help went and got a potential #1,
Needed Special Teams and LB depth or possibly a future SS, got one.
So we didn't PICK YOUR GUYS, oh too bad, we also grabbed a ton of other picks for depth and to fill out possible needs, yet se busted in the draft.
Hung with a New rope and with a Golden spoon in your mouth and you would complain that you were not high enough and that they didn't put chocolate on the spoon for ya.
You say we needed one and got one. Well we needed one and got one for a reach. A defensive end. The problem with a reach is they have even less chance of success. needed a safety got a reach. Needed a WR and got a guy with great combine numbers and no production. Another reach.
Do we need to find a taller tree still?
Or a GM not sold on himself from someone elses success.
Tim Ruskell was loved by everyone in initially......
Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.
Maelstrom787 wrote:Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.
Again, then who did?
ok time to name the one who picked RW.Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today. Some other GM would have had better value. This is a clueless deal. Its gone bad its toast.
Atradees wrote:Maelstrom787 wrote:Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.
Again, then who did?
The picks made today were clueless and awful. You cant, even as a fan pray, that bye miracle of God think they are gonna start or even compete. It could not have been John. NOPE. NO way.
Atradees wrote:Maelstrom787 wrote:Atradees wrote:RW. He didnt make that pick. same guy that picked RW did not make those picks today.
Again, then who did?
The picks made today were clueless and awful. You cant, even as a fan pray, that bye miracle of God think they are gonna start or even compete. It could not have been John. NOPE. NO way.
dutchcoug wrote:This guy is 100% a 12. AKA the worst section of our fan base. He’s been ride or die for at least 5 years.
HawkGA wrote:So another option is to just, you know, not feed the trolls.
Slick wrote:dutchcoug wrote:This guy is 100% a 12. AKA the worst section of our fan base. He’s been ride or die for at least 5 years.
12s since '12. I hate the 'twelves' designation and could give all f**k about it.
Atradees wrote:Worst draft in years. It speaks for itself. Or it will. I have to believe he didn't pick Russell Wilson, Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor or the rest. This is all some fraud being portrayed upon us. The tru driving force behind our superbowls was somebody else.
JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.
Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.
Poorly done draft so far.
Seanhawk wrote:JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.
Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.
Poorly done draft so far.
Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?
Uncle Si wrote:Seanhawk wrote:JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.
Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.
Poorly done draft so far.
Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?
Too easy for these types of posts to call on hindsight.
Seanhawk wrote:Uncle Si wrote:Seanhawk wrote:JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.
Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.
Poorly done draft so far.
Why don't you give us who you would have taken instead of just blindly complaining?
Too easy for these types of posts to call on hindsight.
How's it too easy? No one has played a down yet.
JayhawkMike wrote:So far this draft JS has sucked on picking players but has excelled on making sure we get the best selection of Joe’s while passing on the pros.
Yet, if ONE of the lower rounders pans out they’ll praise JS all day long while forgetting their higher round choices sucked and they basically converted a 1st for that 5th rounder.
Poorly done draft so far.
Sports Hernia wrote:Love watching the butthurt when someone’s “pet players” don’t get drafted by their favorite team. It’s precious, really.
It is currently Fri Feb 26, 2021 3:19 pm
Return to [ NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT ]