hieroglyphics":3xjo430h said:
Why on earth did the Raiders ever fire Cable or Jackson after producing the two best seasons they had since Rich Gannon?
Don't remember why Cable was fired but Jackson was fired because they brought in Reggie McKenzie as GM and he cleaned house.
Hue's hands weren't entirely clean in that either. After Al Davis died Jackson acted as de facto GM, and wanted to maintain total control and be part of the process of bringing in a GM to essentially work under him. Oakland instead opted to bring in a real GM, and in the resulting power struggle Jackson got canned.
That said, from an organizational perspective it was by far the most up-in-the-air year for what has generally been an up-in-the-air organization, so I don't thnk any of this diminishes Jackson as a coaching candidate at all.
The one thing it did do was (IMO unfairly) tarnish Hue as someone who really wants total top-down control. If that's true or not I think will be born out by the results of this process. If we assume all three circling parties want him (Browns, 49ers, Giants) then if he takes the Browns job we can safely conclude he wants the total control (9ers and Giants aren't going to give that to him), and if he's not all about that and wants the best situation he'll take the Giants job. I don't really see any scenario in which he is offered the 9ers job and takes it.