My comment was based on the two tweets from Silver below:
Give Jimmy Haslam & the Browns credit: They went out and got their guy. Niners had first shot if they wanted it. Giants were looming...
and
If you are a Niners fan who wanted Hue: Do not believe anyone who tells you he informed them he didn't have interest. He was interested.
I guess this one too:
As I said all along: Hue was not weighing offers. He was not leveraging anyone. He was waiting for an owner to tell him "You're my guy."
My comment was that I don't really know what to make of this. As everyone knows Silver is good friends with Jackson and every day through this entire process he has been Jackson's public mouthpiece.
It confuses me because I'm inclined to trust Silver on what was actually going on with Hue's side, and not inclined to think he's just carrying water for the 49ers (particularly given that in this series of tweets he also tells Giants fans and Eagles fans to essentially blame their ownership, if they wanted Jackson).
We also have reports from before the 9ers 5 hour interview with Hue that they were seriously interested in him, and we also have a suggestion that the 9ers were waiting to see what happened with the Browns.
Basically, the only way I think all these pieces fit together is the Oakland story again. Hue Jackson wanted the 9ers job, but also wanted final say. He wasn't going to get that with the 9ers, just as he wasn't going to get that with the Giants.
The 9ers wanted Jackson, but want to keep a division of labor between the coach and GM, rather than having a coach/gm.
They decided that not having a coach/GM was more important to them than having Hue Jackson, so waited it out.
If Jackson seriously preferred to be coach/gm of the Browns than coach of the 9ers they could live with that, and that's what Jackson did. This also fits what happened with him in Oakland.
As for where I sit, I like Jackson as a HC candidate and won't ever diminish that at all, but don't like him nearly enough to give him coach/gm powers, as erasing that division of labor is almost always a bad idea. This is true across industries (e.g.
http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/wayneb/pdf ... source.pdf )