Alex Bannister?

Mase

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
759
Reaction score
296
-- Actually it was Holmgren that said Bannister ran the wrong hot route. Green Bay blitzed and all the receivers were supposed to run hooks or slants as all the DBs were squatting the routes. According to Holmgren, only Matt and one of our offensive lineman actually did what they should have on that play.

-- I don't care, if it was Matt's gag job, so be it. But I specifically remember Holmy addressing that play a few days after that game.

Mase
 

themunn

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
3,947
Reaction score
465
Mase":36c18xx0 said:
-- Actually it was Holmgren that said Bannister ran the wrong hot route. Green Bay blitzed and all the receivers were supposed to run hooks or slants as all the DBs were squatting the routes. According to Holmgren, only Matt and one of our offensive lineman actually did what they should have on that play.

-- I don't care, if it was Matt's gag job, so be it. But I specifically remember Holmy addressing that play a few days after that game.

Mase

If 9 out of 11 players get the play wrong you have to address the blame elsewhere - poor coaching in that people don't understand the playbook? matt describing the play wrong? who knows.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
23,040
Reaction score
2,902
Location
Anchorage, AK
Throwdown":3212xcqu said:
onanygivensunday":3212xcqu said:
Throwdown":3212xcqu said:
How do we know he ran the wrong route?
Well, it certainly wasn't Matt's fault... so it had to be Bannister's.

Of courrrrsssee it was NEVER Hasselbecks fault

I don't recall now if it was Holmgren or Matt or someone else, but when asked about that play specifically there was mention of a miscommunication between the qb and wr in which route was being run. Now, you can believe matt through to the wrong route or Alex ran the wrong route, but the two were said to be on different pages on that particular play.
 

TruHammer07

New member
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
1. way to hang him out to dry Holmgren

2. why would he be better now? a little stronger ok. that's not going to go very far. so little upside id be shocked if this amounts to anything more than this.
 

UGotHawked

New member
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Messages
392
Reaction score
0
They were mirrored routes with 4 WRs. You can watch the all 22's and see that Darrell Jackson ran the same slant route on the other side at 2 yards, but Bannister ran it beyond that. Had he ran it at 2 yards (which is likely where Matt thought he would be, it would not have allowed Al Harris to jump it without going through Bannister. That's just how I remember it.
 

theascension

New member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
290
Reaction score
0
I can see certain positions being able to come back in a veteran position in but how many receivers over 34 have EVER done ANYTHING? It'd be a nice story but WR is the hardest position to play when older. He probably won't get anywhere.

I checked PFR and there's been 11 wide receivers with more than 1000 yards receiving over age 35 (out of more than 500 receivers with over 1000 yards receiving). None were comeback stories and of them only Jerry Rice didn't have a big drop in production past 35.
 

bigcc

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
450
rockette was destroying guys on special teams, him/lane are fine gunners, and lockette actually has upside at WR
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,066
Reaction score
7,934
Location
Sultan, WA
kidhawk":1q876zi7 said:
I don't recall now if it was Holmgren or Matt or someone else, but when asked about that play specifically there was mention of a miscommunication between the qb and wr in which route was being run. Now, you can believe matt through to the wrong route or Alex ran the wrong route, but the two were said to be on different pages on that particular play.

I do recall Hasselbeck saying something to the effect that Bannister was supposed to run a shorter hitch route on that play (thus Hasselbeck throwing to a spot) but he kept running up the field. He wasn't calling out Bannister as much as just being truthful of what happened on that play. Harris was an easy target who made the easiest pick 6 of his life. I always wonder what would have happened had we won that game in OT.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
23,040
Reaction score
2,902
Location
Anchorage, AK
Aros":1amcnfdz said:
kidhawk":1amcnfdz said:
I don't recall now if it was Holmgren or Matt or someone else, but when asked about that play specifically there was mention of a miscommunication between the qb and wr in which route was being run. Now, you can believe matt through to the wrong route or Alex ran the wrong route, but the two were said to be on different pages on that particular play.

I do recall Hasselbeck saying something to the effect that Bannister was supposed to run a shorter hitch route on that play (thus Hasselbeck throwing to a spot) but he kept running up the field. He wasn't calling out Bannister as much as just being truthful of what happened on that play. Harris was an easy target who made the easiest pick 6 of his life. I always wonder what would have happened had we won that game in OT.

That game was one of many "what if" games that used to haunt me, but somehow finally being Super Bowl champs has made that hoe away. At least for the time being
 
Top