hawksfansinceday1
Active member
Agree with everything you said Hasselbeck. He's actually an excellent TE for an offense running more spread concepts. As for his poor blocking, yeah it is poor. But if you spread him out wide it negates that liability when the Hawks run because it takes a defender out of the point of attack (which the Hawks were finally doing before he got hurt).Hasselbeck":3mf26bei said:HansGruber":3mf26bei said:You know, it might actually benefit the Seahawks.
Jimmy Graham was a liability at TE last season. We generally use TEs as blockers and Wilson was getting killed last season, often right after Graham got turnstiled by a rusher. When he got injured, our offense actually improved and Wilson was getting sacked literally half as often.
What if the Seahawks drafted a couple Off and Def Linemen, and converted 1 or 2 to TE?
Our OL is going to suck hard early in the season. Might make sense to have 7 linemen out there, even if they do suck. Just run the ball and rely on short fast receivers to get open. Let Wilson do his thing. There's no way we're going to have a pocket passing type offense with whatever OL we manage to patch together.
And we all know Jimmy Graham is worthless as a blocker. We all saw it. I'm amazed Wilson didn't get injured last season. And Graham's production as a receiver, even right before he got injured, just didn't justify the beating that Wilson took. Not a good trade off.
I disagree with this. Wilson and Graham were finally starting to click.. yeah his blocking is non-existent.. but they were figuring out how to work around that.
Our offense started to click when Rawls got the running game going and Bevell went to a spread offense. It wasn't because Jimmy Graham got injured.
If you want to debate having a more rounded TE to help block, thats an entirely different subject.. but I don't see how having a healthy Jimmy Graham to draw attention from defenses is a bad thing for this offense. Especially as they begin to throw the ball a bit more than they have in recent years.