Aros' Fearless Prediction Thread (@ Saints)

[AROS]

Geno is cooking at the moment, but our defense seems to be the meal. I think this game will boil down to if Kamara plays or not and it sounds like he is so I will have to give the edge to the home team in this one. It's really anyone's game.


Aros' Fearless Prediction: Seahawks 23 - Saints 27

Aros' Fearless Record: 3-1

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Should be a tough battle against a better defense. But this offense is rolling, and the Running game is on point.

I'll go Hawks 20-17

 

[CalgaryFan05]

Geno is cooking at the moment, but our defense seems to be the meal. I think this game will boil down to if Kamara plays or not and it sounds like he is so I will have to give the edge to the home team in this one. It's really anyone's game.


Aros' Fearless Prediction: Seahawks 23 - Saints 27

Aros' Fearless Record: 3-1

Points allowed this season says Saints 28, Hawks 24.

But I don't think that tells the story of our offense. Or our defense last week. If the can stop the top from coming off the D - and the offense is firing the same way, I'd reverse that. 28 Hawks = over Saints 21.

Then again, I don't have a crystal ball. The hawks, and from their 1-3 record, the saints seem to have multiple personality disorder.

I'm calling Hawks by a 1/2 or full TD. Especially if Dissly breaks one off again

 

[Chawker]

Our defense is a revolving gate, and so goes any hopes for a victory.

Seahawks 16

Aints 27

Record 2-2

 

[Ruminator]

Seahawks 31
Saints 34

 

[Shanegotyou11]

Saints 38
Hawks 24

 

[Donn2390]

You guys need to revise your predictions, you are going to see an amazing defense this weekend....
Hawks all the way....

 

[FPD]

I see a clumsy yet determined game from both defenses resulting in a turnover or two each. The two offenses will have their moments, but there won't be 40+ points scored by either team. Make that not even 30+ points:

Saints: 25
Seahawks: 23

 

[Rainger]

Well I don't normally make predictions because I am a Jinx. If I make a prediction then 99% of the time I will lose because the team I back even if they are a 100% chance of winning, they will lose. But here we go 31 30 Hawks

 

[PlinytheCenter]

Hawks - 31 Saints - 24 The defense should be rightfully embarrassed by their performance last week. Crowd noise (with the associated confusion) I would hope will be better handled than last week. Homer glasses fully in place.

 

[samwize77]

Saints 24
Hawks 17
An emotional letdown after last week. We can not contain Kamara.

 

[Spohawks]

After some deep and half hearted thought...The Hawks Oline is money right now, the offence has some excellent weapons and Geno is on fire.

The Defence is showing signs of life in the back field but, well, you know.

Calling for a semi shootout, get your popcorn ready!!!

Hawks 36
Saints 31
2-2

 

[Lagartixa]

Well I don't normally make predictions because I am a Jink. If I make a prediction then 99% of the time I will lose because the team I back even if they are a 100% chance of winning, they will lose. But here we go 31 30 Hawks

It's unfortunate that Murphy's Law is recursive.
The example that's frequently used is that you can't make it rain during a drought by washing your car.
The more-relevant example here would be that you can't make the Seahawks win by predicting a Seahawks loss.

 

[Spohawks]

It's unfortunate that Murphy's Law is recursive.
The example that's frequently used is that you can't make it rain during a drought by washing your car.
The more-relevant example here would be that you can't make the Seahawks win by predicting a Seahawks loss.

I guess we will see what happens

 

[Lagartixa]

I guess we will see what happens

I was responding specifically to @Rainger's assertion that he's a jinx (he wrote "Jink," but I'm almost sure he meant "jinx") and...

If I make a prediction then 99% of the time I will lose because the team I back even if they are a 100% chance of winning, they will lose.

He then predicted a narrow Seahawks win, and I knew the obvious thought was "if your predictions are so frequently wrong, why not predict a Seahawks loss?" and presented the less-famous-than-Murphy's-Law-itself fact that Murphy's Law is recursive.

 

[Spohawks]

I was responding specifically to @Rainger's assertion that he's a jinx (he wrote "Jink," but I'm almost sure he meant "jinx") and...



He then predicted a narrow Seahawks win, and I knew the obvious thought was "if your predictions are so frequently wrong, why not predict a Seahawks loss?" and presented the less-famous-than-Murphy's-Law-itself fact that Murphy's Law is recursive.

I get it. Jinx aren't a thing, or people would jinx someone to win a lottery.

 

[fire_marshall_bill]

Aints 24
Seahawks 17

 

[CostaRicaHawk]

Hawks have scored 19 more points so far in the season.
Saints have given up 19 less points for the season then Seahawks Def.

19+19 = 38

Hawks 38
Saints 19

 

[CallMeADawg]

Seattle 35 New Orleans 22

 

[Bear-Hawk]

High-scoring game.

Saints 33-27