Attyla the Hawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,559
- Reaction score
- 47
kearly":13hu0d9e said:I think it's interesting that-
Seattle converts JR Sweezy from DT to guard which yields a decent player. Result: Seattle repeats this experiment many many times over the following three years.
Richard Sherman converts from WR to CB in college and turns into one of the best CBs in the game. Result: Seattle barely even looks at WR to CB conversion projects.
The situations are a little different, but still it's pretty surprising how much the FO has been swayed by the Sweezy conversion vs. how little they were swayed by the Sherman conversion. You'd think it would be the other way around, with Seattle acquiring 1-2 WR a year just to convert to CB, while chalking up Sweezy as a fluke.
I think you have to consider motivation.
In this case, Seattle is reacting largely to the lack of athleticism to be found in the OL classes. Thus seeking a different avenue in order to acquire the athletic types they want for the position.
In terms of CBs, there hasn't been that same kind of shortage of talents to work with.
Additionally, the lack of general preparedness faced with OL prospects coming out of college doesn't place as high of a premium in terms of skill set as a rookie. If you're having to start largely from zero on day one of rookie minicamp -- then there is less inherent advantage to drafting a college offensive lineman. You're probably better off finding a guy who athletically can do what you want and someone who can learn quickly. As opposed to getting a mediocre athlete who has severely underdeveloped skills and even worse -- acquired bad habits.
I think there are differences between the supply of talents coming out at each position group that would impact decision making in this regard.