SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Well, one thing is a given.....no matter who they sign, plenty of people won't like it....just because :irishdrinkers:
SoulfishHawk":3mccq3jq said:Nah, better O Line coach now, he'll be fine.
sutz":158et0bz said:If we truly are going back to "Pete Carroll" football, than run blocking will be emphasized over pass blocking.
The philosophy being that if you can run well, you get that extra half-step in the passing game from play action. The inability to run over the last couple of years kind of scotched that, as nobody respected our run game enough to make it happen.
Under that idea, sounds like Fluker would fit right in.
Not many teams in the NFL have a scrambling QB like Wilson, and judging by the horrendous run blocking by our O-Line last season, and Wilson being the #1 rusher, the Run game was BADLY BROKEN.adeltaY":7rut75cz said:sutz":7rut75cz said:If we truly are going back to "Pete Carroll" football, than run blocking will be emphasized over pass blocking.
The philosophy being that if you can run well, you get that extra half-step in the passing game from play action. The inability to run over the last couple of years kind of scotched that, as nobody respected our run game enough to make it happen.
Under that idea, sounds like Fluker would fit right in.
https://footballoutsiders.com/stat-anal ... on-passing
Data doesn't support the assertion that a successful running is necessary for an effective PA passing game.
I agree on signing Fluker. Giants fans seemed to like him a lot.
That article is almost flat earth worthy. There's a point where data spreadsheet writers with no applicable experience are completely worthless. Most of the time, data with the right criteria is fine, absent agenda.adeltaY":126a53qy said:sutz":126a53qy said:If we truly are going back to "Pete Carroll" football, than run blocking will be emphasized over pass blocking.
The philosophy being that if you can run well, you get that extra half-step in the passing game from play action. The inability to run over the last couple of years kind of scotched that, as nobody respected our run game enough to make it happen.
Under that idea, sounds like Fluker would fit right in.
https://footballoutsiders.com/stat-anal ... on-passing
Data doesn't support the assertion that a successful running is necessary for an effective PA passing game.
I agree on signing Fluker. Giants fans seemed to like him a lot.
vin.couve12":1h2pp1yx said:That article is almost flat earth worthy. There's a point where data spreadsheet writers with no applicable experience are completely worthless. Most of the time, data with the right criteria is fine, absent agenda.adeltaY":1h2pp1yx said:sutz":1h2pp1yx said:If we truly are going back to "Pete Carroll" football, than run blocking will be emphasized over pass blocking.
The philosophy being that if you can run well, you get that extra half-step in the passing game from play action. The inability to run over the last couple of years kind of scotched that, as nobody respected our run game enough to make it happen.
Under that idea, sounds like Fluker would fit right in.
https://footballoutsiders.com/stat-anal ... on-passing
Data doesn't support the assertion that a successful running is necessary for an effective PA passing game.
I agree on signing Fluker. Giants fans seemed to like him a lot.
This is not one of those times. It's a flat earth article.
And yes, I know, I'm a jerk.
adeltaY":3jx3qutu said:vin.couve12":3jx3qutu said:That article is almost flat earth worthy. There's a point where data spreadsheet writers with no applicable experience are completely worthless. Most of the time, data with the right criteria is fine, absent agenda.adeltaY":3jx3qutu said:sutz":3jx3qutu said:If we truly are going back to "Pete Carroll" football, than run blocking will be emphasized over pass blocking.
The philosophy being that if you can run well, you get that extra half-step in the passing game from play action. The inability to run over the last couple of years kind of scotched that, as nobody respected our run game enough to make it happen.
Under that idea, sounds like Fluker would fit right in.
https://footballoutsiders.com/stat-anal ... on-passing
Data doesn't support the assertion that a successful running is necessary for an effective PA passing game.
I agree on signing Fluker. Giants fans seemed to like him a lot.
This is not one of those times. It's a flat earth article.
And yes, I know, I'm a jerk.
Don't want to get into it here, but Pederson actually employed an analytics team with a direct line to advise him on decisions, especially on 4th down, and they won the SB this year.
I generally trust statistical analysis and try to employ healthy skepticism. Just because football guys say its true doesn't make it so.