Unless I'm misunderstanding something that's actually not true. Earl can give up his private medical records and other teams can do their own testing but Seattle does not have to give those teams their 8+ years of medical information. That's an important distinction given that Earl has an incentive not to reveal any damning medical results which place a large burden on teams to do extensive work to make sure they don't miss anything. Seattle on the other hand pretty much knows what they are dealing with.chris98251":po5bizdy said:knownone":po5bizdy said:He knows the system. The Seahawks have his medical records, know the extent of his injuries, and they have the depth at safety to bring him back slowly. Other teams will likely undervalue him due to his injuries. Money you say? Seattle has 100+ million in cap space over the next two seasons. They could sign Clark, Reed, Wilson, Earl, and still have a significant amount of cap space to spare.rlkats":po5bizdy said:knownone":po5bizdy said:I wouldn't rule out Earl staying in Seattle. It might sound counter-intuitive but we are the best case scenario for him.
Why is Seattle the best place for him? There are a ton of teams that can use his leadership and play style to improve their D. Besides he wants money oh wait he wants MONEY and Seattle don’t have it. They have other core players that need that coin. Players like Clark that needs to be paid. He is gone from Seattle and I don’t think it’s even a though for him at this point. You think him flipping the bird to the sideline was just for fun? I don’t think so. I would love to have him in San Fran, but I don’t think we could afford him.
Also, Seattle can still franchise Earl if they wanted to. I don't know if they will try to keep Earl but the idea that he's for sure not a Seahawk is shortsighted.
All that info on injuries is available to every team and they would do a work up on him also. Earl will make sure he is not undervalued, why he was holding out in the first place he feels he is.
What you can't measure is his attitude and mentality, right now in Seattle it from all appearences is Cancerous.
I don't buy into those narratives personally. I'm not in the building and I have no idea what those relationships actually look like. I agree that things seemed cancerous on a superficial level but in a much different way than say Richard Sherman's situation. Earl was not calling out the team or coaches. He just wanted to be paid. His mentality did not change on the field and all of the problems he caused were directly related to his contract situation.
I'm not trying to defend Earl because I think he acted pretty selfish overall and I thought he had one of the dumber holdouts I can remember. I just don't think it would be shocking to see him return this offseason.