Calm down and read
this.
And
this.
The first day of free agency is a huge day for winner's-curse contracts. Carroll and Schneider know what the team needs. Based on what they've said in the last couple of weeks, they agree with most people here that the defensive front 7 needs an overhaul. But rather than getting upset with them for not getting into a bidding war over players who are getting deals in the first hours of free agency, we should be glad they're not falling into emotional decisions. Take a look at that graph up near the top of the Wikipedia article.
Good points, but I would respond that this only works if, like the Patriots, a team manages their cap by "
not overpaying for “marquee” players in order to afford average ones at positions for which other teams can only pay bottom dollar..." A team can overpay for marquee players in either free agency or via trades.
Have the Hawks been successful with free agents acquired earlier or later in the season? Jason Myers, Michael Bennet, and Cliff Avril were early free agency acquisitions. Cary Williams, Eddie Lacy, J’Marcus Webb, Bradley Sowell, Ahkello Witherspoon, Luke Joeckl, and Matt Flynn were early signings.
Sidney Rice, Zach Miller, Geno Smith were late pickups, as was Robert Gallery.
Mixed bags in both.
I didn't realize there were so few later signings, but I had trouble coming up with more than a few.
Where the Hawks have really messed up, IMHO, is in marquee trades, rather than marquee free agent pickups. I think they horribly miscast and/or overpaid for Graham, Harvin, Adams, and Richardson. They certainly did well with the Lynch and Clemons. Once again, a mixed bag.
I went into this post with the bias that they tend to overplay later in free agency, and whiff on trades. The likely takeaway, however, is that, like most teams, John and Pete have had mixed results all the way around. Maybe not helpful, but dangit I did all that research, maybe someone else can find a better point in it all.