Blitzer88
Active member
[tweet]https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1261034053333143552[/tweet]
ivotuk":b3qj48qp said:4th. Behind Anthony Gordon :snack:
Appyhawk":1h3b660v said:I've been pulling to get Geno back, but I fear this could close the Clowney door.
Appyhawk":3odyt3ns said:I've been pulling to get Geno back, but I fear this could close the Clowney door.
12AngryHawks":1h5rpohj said:Appyhawk":1h5rpohj said:I've been pulling to get Geno back, but I fear this could close the Clowney door.
How so?
How does this prove they weren’t interested? They might have seen several palatable options and decided the low-cost alternative made more sense. Or maybe they inquired and Cam decided he’d rather hold out for a situation where he’s more likely to see the field.SoulfishHawk":2p7n22t0 said:But...but wait.....the internet experts told us the Hawks were interested in Cam. Nope, never were imo.
I think I can help with your question:Rat":1dy89i62 said:How does this prove they weren’t interested? They might have seen several palatable options and decided the low-cost alternative made more sense. Or maybe they inquired and Cam decided he’d rather hold out for a situation where he’s more likely to see the field.SoulfishHawk":1dy89i62 said:But...but wait.....the internet experts told us the Hawks were interested in Cam. Nope, never were imo.
Sun Tzu":1td3zaw1 said:...European simpletons burned witches. And what do we burn apart from witches? Many indigenous peoples burned dung as a fuel source. Witches must burn because they are made of dung. Newtons are made of fig and pastry. Therefore, Cam Newton is obviously not a witch and would accept any contract offer from the Hawks.
Thus, we can logically conclude that Clowney is a witch and we were never interested in Newton.