Definitely. If you want a concrete example, Bruce Arians called out Tom Brady last season after their week 1 loss to the Saints when Brady threw three INTs.Scorpion05":9g2wbmf3 said:What you're saying is actually pretty logical and fair. For most QBs in the league. The question is, do you think those "obvious coaching things" apply to Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Josh Allen, Mahomes, Peyton Manning, etc.?
I don't agree with this view. Even in a run first offense, QBs can justify a top salary by simply being efficient on third downs and sustaining drives. However, our passing offense was not efficient over the second half of the season and it was clear that it was struggling against cover 2. The lack of volume is completely a red herring; you are assuming that if we had increased volume then efficiency would have also increased but I don't see any basis for that assumption. Efficiency and volume are normally inversely correlated.Scorpion05":9g2wbmf3 said:Because to be honest that is what Russell Wilson was in the 2nd half of the season except for 2 games. A game manager, while being paid like an elite QB. And it's not just because of poor play, there was clearly a shift in opening up the offense.
I don't think that category has ever existed in the NFL for any player. You may not hear about conversations behind closed doors as many teams wisely try to keep that sort of stuff private. Russ is great, but the role of the coaching staff is to put him in the best situation to succeed. If he is throwing turnovers due to bad luck then they can and should be ignored, but if the turnovers are unforced errors then that's the coaching staff's responsibility to help sort out. Labeling that as meddling is silly.Scorpion05":9g2wbmf3 said:I think this conversation is revealing that Pete, and frankly some of us fans, do not see Russ as being in that category.