KCHawkGirl":labpclaz said:
So you actually have no reasons beyond making personal attacks? How disappointing.
Let me explain. You have a tendency of talking to others as though you are above them, they bore you. You act jaded, believing that somehow makes you superior, more intelligent. That might work with some, it don't work with me. You may notice I never quote you, or reply to you. I resist that, while tempting, out of respect for the forum.
I made a simple comment,
all things considered, I would take Tate over Harvin and I stand by that. Your comment "I think you're crazy, but give me your reasons, for entertainment purposes, if nothing else". I am not here to entertain you. Understand that. I've watched you do the same to countless other posters and I think it's crass, even ugly, but not my business. But when you choose to speak down to me, do know, I will not tolerate it.
In this example, you apparently thought someone would have to be crazy to want Tate over Harvin...actually, you saw an opportunity to flex your delusional all-knowingness. Are you familiar with the concept of loyalty? That's just another reason to keep Tate over Harvin (if that choice had to be made). That, and we could sign both Tate and Baldwin for the price of Harvin alone. I guess I need to inform you of the record setting pace this team is on...with Tate, not Harvin. But you would kick Tate to the curb if given the choice? That says a lot about who you are, IMO.
I LMAO when I think of the comments that would have followed, had Harvin signed with SF, instead of us. I will leave you with that. Just try to imagine what you would have to say about St. Percy in that scenario. I am sorry if I offended you personally. Shouldn't have. I don't expect the same apology from you. I will now put you on ignore and ask that you do the same with me.
Take care and aloha. Peace.